Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jacob Lewis" data-source="post: 8496489" data-attributes="member: 6667921">Same for me. I wish there was more to it than what it is. Not a whole lot, but something. As soon as you pick your subclass, the big decisions for your character are essentially done. Feats are either uninteresting or too good to actually be considered a choice. I hadn't once been invested in a character I played in 5e because of this. I've literally said to groups, I don't really care what I play. I'll play whatever. On the other hand, there are some merits to a somewhat homogeneous system. I have actually used the same character idea for three different builds; a dwarven wizard/rogue, dwarven bard, and a dwarven arcane trickster. They were all the same character. I kept his class(es) a secret from the other players as best I could so they couldn't pigeonhole him. And I barely noticed a difference mechanically at the table.</blockquote>