How crude are the Thieve's World stories?

variant

Adventurer
I was considering picking up the First Blood compliation, Sanctuary, Turning Point, and Enemies of Fortune, but first I wondered how crude it was. I have heard that it is gritty and while I can tolerate some, there is a threshold.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


Gritty doesn't equate to obscene - it's referencing that it's more swords-n-sorcery than high fantasy. There are times that punches aren't pulled with things that happen to the characters but they aren't described in a graphic manner.

They're great books, IMO.

That having been said, the book that sets up the second series, Sanctuary can be somewhat disturbing. The book recounts through historical perspective and character flashbacks what life in the city is like when it's ruled by evil cultists. Again, most of the description leaves it to the reader's imagination to fill in the horror aspect. It's more of a "oh wow, that's horrible" than a gross-out, though, so I think you'd be fine.

And a lot of the stories aren't bad at all. They're more day-in-the-life type stories.

Nutshell summary, they're gritty because they're often about surviving physical, magical, and even mundane threats, not because of over-the-top depictions of gore.

Azgulor
 

The characters in there are rarely good. There is rape and slaughter. One of the characters you meet is a vivisectionist. I never felt it crossed any lines but if they were movies they would be R.

I really like the books though especially the first ones in the series and then the ones from the relaunch.
 

I read 'em back in the mid 1980's when I was ... oh ... 15 or so. I wasn't upset by any of 'em. I liked the first two a lot, but then got bored with where it went as a storyline.
 

The vivisectionist is one of the few outright villains in the early books, and some scenes describing his lair are about as graphic as it gets. His part in the story is over fairly quickly, and those are the only parts I would describe as NC-17 material. The rest is pretty much rated R.

It seemed to be somewhat of a theme in those books that the same character that is portrayed as a hero by one story might be portrayed as a villain in another story. It seemed like each author "owned" a character or two, and that author's permission was needed (and rarely granted) to kill their character off.
 

Thieve's world has its moments of grim n gritty, but it's not over the top or particularly descriptive of it.

Mostly tame, if you ask me.
 

I didn't find the stories offensively gruesome, but I did think the general tone got too dark and unpleasant after the first story collection. I guess I just prefer a less grim and gritty style.
 

I rather liked the stories... right up to the appearance of that stupid 'avatar of a god' guy whose name I can't remember. I remember that I really hated him and his 'oh, I'm so full of angst, I can't die, no one understands me, boo hoo hoo, I think I'll kill a bunch of innocent people'...... it was bad enough he was in one story, but once he appeared, everyone else put him in their stories too....
 

Is there any fantasy that is really crude? I can't think of any, then again, I've never read Norman's "Gor" novels.

My understanding was that there's a real dearth of good, old-fashioned vulgarity in fantasy (and SF) these days.
 

Remove ads

Top