Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How D&D Beyond Will Handle Access To 2014 Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burnside" data-source="post: 9440483" data-attributes="member: 6910340"><p>This annoys me. I'm gonna have to learn and use the 2024 rules because I am a pro DM and players will expect it (which I get). But I personally am not convinced that the new rules represent a better game and am unsure whether I will really choose to use them given the option not to do so - and I really wish DNDBeyond would support that (although it doesn't shock me that they won't).</p><p></p><p>My biggest objection is that the 2024 game is crunchier overall, with a heavier emphasis on tactical combat (especially for martial characters), and combat will be slower, and character creation will take longer. NONE of my players (and I have more than 40 regulars) have ever expressed to me that they wish 5E was more complex/crunchier. I realize that there are hardcore players who do want that, but they represent a small minority of players.</p><p></p><p>I wish they would respect that there are a ton of casual players who are never going to eat, drink, and breath this stuff. People just want to play a fun game with their friends for the most part, enjoy a good story, make meaningful choices, and see their characters grow. Very, very few people are interested in system mastery and are going to pay a ton of attention to optimizing, tactical play, or even tbh reading the Player's Handbook.</p><p></p><p>I foresee a lot of table-time taken up with "Burnside, how does this work?" in my future.</p><p></p><p>And sentences like "Well, IDEALLY you should be using your Two-Weapon Fighting Feat so that for your Action you can Crush with your main hand and then Nick with your dagger using your off-hand WITHOUT using your Bonus Attack so that you can then use your Bonus Action to activate your I Always Get Temporary Hit Points Ability and then as a Reaction, Disengage without drawing an Opportunity Attack for up to half your Movement! Doesn't that sound romantic?"</p><p></p><p>Also, I would very, very much prefer they just continue to let us run all-2014 rules until all the new books are out. Being forced to run a hybrid of the old and new rules for 6 months is very annoying to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burnside, post: 9440483, member: 6910340"] This annoys me. I'm gonna have to learn and use the 2024 rules because I am a pro DM and players will expect it (which I get). But I personally am not convinced that the new rules represent a better game and am unsure whether I will really choose to use them given the option not to do so - and I really wish DNDBeyond would support that (although it doesn't shock me that they won't). My biggest objection is that the 2024 game is crunchier overall, with a heavier emphasis on tactical combat (especially for martial characters), and combat will be slower, and character creation will take longer. NONE of my players (and I have more than 40 regulars) have ever expressed to me that they wish 5E was more complex/crunchier. I realize that there are hardcore players who do want that, but they represent a small minority of players. I wish they would respect that there are a ton of casual players who are never going to eat, drink, and breath this stuff. People just want to play a fun game with their friends for the most part, enjoy a good story, make meaningful choices, and see their characters grow. Very, very few people are interested in system mastery and are going to pay a ton of attention to optimizing, tactical play, or even tbh reading the Player's Handbook. I foresee a lot of table-time taken up with "Burnside, how does this work?" in my future. And sentences like "Well, IDEALLY you should be using your Two-Weapon Fighting Feat so that for your Action you can Crush with your main hand and then Nick with your dagger using your off-hand WITHOUT using your Bonus Attack so that you can then use your Bonus Action to activate your I Always Get Temporary Hit Points Ability and then as a Reaction, Disengage without drawing an Opportunity Attack for up to half your Movement! Doesn't that sound romantic?" Also, I would very, very much prefer they just continue to let us run all-2014 rules until all the new books are out. Being forced to run a hybrid of the old and new rules for 6 months is very annoying to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How D&D Beyond Will Handle Access To 2014 Rules
Top