Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9454771" data-attributes="member: 7034611">make available to the public in some form (digital download / print) as a product, for free or for a priceDid you call them official D&amp;D rules? Even if you did and nothing happened, that is not the criteria that decides whether something is legal.to confuse the issue? This is not the first time you did, just the first time I am mentioning itlore and story are not rules, the subset refers to only having an example feat and one example subclass per class, etc.because the setting is not part of the ruleset and D&amp;D was always setting agnostic. Changing the rules however means it no longer is D&amp;D, but probably something close enough that you calling it D&amp;D is fine, you publishing it under that name is not however. As I said, this is a legal argument.yea, 5e is separate from all of them and they are all compatible with it, including D&amp;D 5e.what you do at your table is only of interest to your table, once you go beyond that, you will get in trouble if you distribute something under the name D&amp;D, assuming WotC notices itthat is not what I said, there seems to be no point in continuing this if you gloss over the distinctions I made and misrepresent what I wrote. You can disagree with my point, but not misrepresent it, and you continue to do the latter</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 9454771, member: 7034611"] make available to the public in some form (digital download / print) as a product, for free or for a price Did you call them official D&D rules? Even if you did and nothing happened, that is not the criteria that decides whether something is legal. to confuse the issue? This is not the first time you did, just the first time I am mentioning it lore and story are not rules, the subset refers to only having an example feat and one example subclass per class, etc. because the setting is not part of the ruleset and D&D was always setting agnostic. Changing the rules however means it no longer is D&D, but probably something close enough that you calling it D&D is fine, you publishing it under that name is not however. As I said, this is a legal argument. yea, 5e is separate from all of them and they are all compatible with it, including D&D 5e. what you do at your table is only of interest to your table, once you go beyond that, you will get in trouble if you distribute something under the name D&D, assuming WotC notices it that is not what I said, there seems to be no point in continuing this if you gloss over the distinctions I made and misrepresent what I wrote. You can disagree with my point, but not misrepresent it, and you continue to do the latter [/QUOTE]

Verification