Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9457295" data-attributes="member: 6801228">There has been no legal case that has gone through the court system to answer this question. You assume it is illegal, but no one actually knows. And, while legal definitions can be useful, according to the state of California <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/trends/2022/california-court-decision-bees-are-fish-shines-new-light-biodiversity-crisis/&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiXxtq5x76IAxXnjokEHWvDPdIQFnoECB4QAw&amp;usg=AOvVaw1wQWjmx2S2fXK4ld7_DKPt" target="_blank">Bees are Fish</a> and according to New York law <a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.vox.com/2014/7/22/5877325/new-york-law-sandwich-burrito-tax&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjtu9fMx76IAxU5tokEHSpSMOwQFnoECDIQAQ&amp;usg=AOvVaw12D4FpcTNPQDaDOZSonYZj" target="_blank">a Burrito is a sandwich</a>. So the idea of using legal definitions to fall back on what the reality of a situation is, especially on a subject that has never gone to court and is working on &quot;understanding&quot;... it doesn't have much weight for me.Why do you continue to skip the rest of my post? I asked the question in a rhetorical style in an attempt to highlight the confusing elements of your response. Not because I don't understand what we are talking about. So, to repeat myself, you seem to have no clue what I was talking about if you think my example in anyway recognized a distinction between the 5e SRD and the TTRPG DnD 5e.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9457295, member: 6801228"] There has been no legal case that has gone through the court system to answer this question. You [I]assume[/I] it is illegal, but no one actually knows. And, while legal definitions can be useful, according to the state of California [URL='https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/environment_energy_resources/resources/trends/2022/california-court-decision-bees-are-fish-shines-new-light-biodiversity-crisis/&ved=2ahUKEwiXxtq5x76IAxXnjokEHWvDPdIQFnoECB4QAw&usg=AOvVaw1wQWjmx2S2fXK4ld7_DKPt']Bees are Fish[/URL] and according to New York law [URL='https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.vox.com/2014/7/22/5877325/new-york-law-sandwich-burrito-tax&ved=2ahUKEwjtu9fMx76IAxU5tokEHSpSMOwQFnoECDIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw12D4FpcTNPQDaDOZSonYZj']a Burrito is a sandwich[/URL]. So the idea of using legal definitions to fall back on what the reality of a situation is, especially on a subject that has never gone to court and is working on "understanding"... it doesn't have much weight for me. Why do you continue to skip the rest of my post? I asked the question in a rhetorical style in an attempt to highlight the confusing elements of your response. Not because I don't understand what we are talking about. So, to repeat myself, you seem to have no clue what I was talking about if you think my example in anyway recognized a distinction between the 5e SRD and the TTRPG DnD 5e. [/QUOTE]

Verification