Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How did you learn to run or play Mage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9690777" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Oh, Mage. Yes, back in grad school I played in a <em>Mage: the Ascension</em> Chronicle that lasted for years. Probably the best tabletop RPG campaign I've ever been in.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I came out of it feeling that <em>Mage: the Ascension</em> was both the best RPG, and also the worst, depending on who was running and playing. It requires players who are interested in investigating what the magic system and their individual paradigms can do, but not to the point that they abuse the system. And it needs a GM who will allow them to, just short of them abusing the system. It also needs players who can work with inter-personal differences. Mages of different types really should have remarkably different views on the world, and you have to have people who can do that, but not degrade into conflict within the party.</p><p></p><p>Our GM never suggested that running it was hard. It seemed like it took a goodly amount of preparation, in that solid adversaries for Mages really needed to be fully statted out. A D&D fighter can go up against a critter with a cut-down, sketch of a stat block, but Mages can try some really weird things, such that the GM is better off with all the details at hand.</p><p></p><p>The GM didn't seem to have any issues coming up with interesting "adventures" either. He seemed to generally approach it as, 1) Define an interesting antagonist. 2) Define what thing that antagonist is gonna do that the PCs wouldn't like to see happen. 3) define any interesting places involved. The Mages trying to work out how to approach the problems usually did the rest of the "adventure" work for him. </p><p></p><p>We mostly played as a group of four, with occasional solos - he had us all developing individual resources of various kinds, and those involved solo adventures. And Arete quests were solos as well. But we also explored some "troupe play" approaches... </p><p></p><p>After our Mages had run for a while, he had us make up secondary characters as well, most of whom were not themselves mages, to explore other corners of the WW universe, and give us stuff to do when our own Mage was for some reason out of the picture, or someone was absent and we didn't want to move the core plot without them. And for those we got creative. In discussion, for example, I'd said I was glad we were playing Mage, rather than Vampire, because I'd probably not have fun playing what I personally viewed as a monster. So the GM challenged me to make up a vampire I <em>could</em> have fun playing - and that character became a frequent go-to when the Mages butted up against the vampires of the city.</p><p></p><p>Then, he added a "B-Group" of mages, run by a different set of players, and our A-group characters would make appearances (singly - we were at that point much more powerful than they were and more than one of us would dominate a session). And we each had <em>very</em> different approaches to magic and our world, so we were really entertaining for B-group. </p><p></p><p>None of us seemed to ever have an issue coming up with characters we wanted to play. Our original characters, our secondaries, and a second Chronicle (which had to end when the GM moved away), character concepts seemed to leap out of us. The first round of characters, for example, was super-easy: The comp-sci major took a Virtual Adept. The biology student pre-veterinarian took a Verbena, the guy who really wanted to tear things up took a Werewolf, and I slid really smoothly into a dangerously curious Dreamspeaker...</p><p></p><p>We did try a spin at Mage: the Awakening, and we all hated it.</p><p></p><p>Keeping things dramatic? So not a problem. See above about trying weird stuff with magic, and having highly different points of view. For most of us, it was the first time we really threw ourselves into playing characters as deeply fully-realized people as possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 9690777, member: 177"] Oh, Mage. Yes, back in grad school I played in a [I]Mage: the Ascension[/I] Chronicle that lasted for years. Probably the best tabletop RPG campaign I've ever been in. Mind you, I came out of it feeling that [I]Mage: the Ascension[/I] was both the best RPG, and also the worst, depending on who was running and playing. It requires players who are interested in investigating what the magic system and their individual paradigms can do, but not to the point that they abuse the system. And it needs a GM who will allow them to, just short of them abusing the system. It also needs players who can work with inter-personal differences. Mages of different types really should have remarkably different views on the world, and you have to have people who can do that, but not degrade into conflict within the party. Our GM never suggested that running it was hard. It seemed like it took a goodly amount of preparation, in that solid adversaries for Mages really needed to be fully statted out. A D&D fighter can go up against a critter with a cut-down, sketch of a stat block, but Mages can try some really weird things, such that the GM is better off with all the details at hand. The GM didn't seem to have any issues coming up with interesting "adventures" either. He seemed to generally approach it as, 1) Define an interesting antagonist. 2) Define what thing that antagonist is gonna do that the PCs wouldn't like to see happen. 3) define any interesting places involved. The Mages trying to work out how to approach the problems usually did the rest of the "adventure" work for him. We mostly played as a group of four, with occasional solos - he had us all developing individual resources of various kinds, and those involved solo adventures. And Arete quests were solos as well. But we also explored some "troupe play" approaches... After our Mages had run for a while, he had us make up secondary characters as well, most of whom were not themselves mages, to explore other corners of the WW universe, and give us stuff to do when our own Mage was for some reason out of the picture, or someone was absent and we didn't want to move the core plot without them. And for those we got creative. In discussion, for example, I'd said I was glad we were playing Mage, rather than Vampire, because I'd probably not have fun playing what I personally viewed as a monster. So the GM challenged me to make up a vampire I [I]could[/I] have fun playing - and that character became a frequent go-to when the Mages butted up against the vampires of the city. Then, he added a "B-Group" of mages, run by a different set of players, and our A-group characters would make appearances (singly - we were at that point much more powerful than they were and more than one of us would dominate a session). And we each had [I]very[/I] different approaches to magic and our world, so we were really entertaining for B-group. None of us seemed to ever have an issue coming up with characters we wanted to play. Our original characters, our secondaries, and a second Chronicle (which had to end when the GM moved away), character concepts seemed to leap out of us. The first round of characters, for example, was super-easy: The comp-sci major took a Virtual Adept. The biology student pre-veterinarian took a Verbena, the guy who really wanted to tear things up took a Werewolf, and I slid really smoothly into a dangerously curious Dreamspeaker... We did try a spin at Mage: the Awakening, and we all hated it. Keeping things dramatic? So not a problem. See above about trying weird stuff with magic, and having highly different points of view. For most of us, it was the first time we really threw ourselves into playing characters as deeply fully-realized people as possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How did you learn to run or play Mage?
Top