Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Storm Raven" data-source="post: 4877279" data-attributes="member: 307">Well, first one wonders why you felt the need to dredge up an argument from a closed thread in which you were given an explicit admonishment not to respond to my posts. This is (obviously) a different thread, but it seems poor manners to refer back to an argument that has been locked by the moderators in this way.Second, this is an entirely different thread, with an entirely different issue. And if you bother to go back and look at the thread, you may note that I didn't say anything not entirely consistent with the quotes your provided from Coleman and Gygax. The rate of advancement for 1e and 3e are comparable when modules are analyzed, and they were intended to be in a comparable range by their respective designers.So, we are left with you posting a random non-sequitur referencing a closed thread making an analogy that simply doesn't work. Good job.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Storm Raven, post: 4877279, member: 307"] Well, first one wonders why you felt the need to dredge up an argument from a closed thread in which you were given an explicit admonishment not to respond to my posts. This is (obviously) a different thread, but it seems poor manners to refer back to an argument that has been locked by the moderators in this way. Second, this is an entirely different thread, with an entirely different issue. And if you bother to go back and look at the thread, you may note that I didn't say anything not entirely consistent with the quotes your provided from Coleman and Gygax. The rate of advancement for 1e and 3e are comparable when modules are analyzed, and they were intended to be in a comparable range by their respective designers. So, we are left with you posting a random non-sequitur referencing a closed thread making an analogy that simply doesn't work. Good job. [/QUOTE]

Verification