Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How 'different' can a setting be, for you?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aristotle" data-source="post: 1717177" data-attributes="member: 5885"><p>I know their are similar threads and comments throughout the forums. I lurk more than I post so I've seen a bunch of them. Still, I've been wanting to ask this for a while now (partially out of curiosity, but also as a poorly veiled bit of marketing research). So here goes...</p><p></p><p>How 'different' can a campaign setting be before you decide its strayed too far away from the game for your tastes? Do you prefer a game where nearly all of the difference is flavor and clever 'twists' in the fluff? Or can you stand a setting where changes have been made to the 'crunchy bits' of the game? If so, how far can those changes to the rules go before it crosses the line for you?</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For instance...<br /> <br /> A setting with only one race (i.e. only humans) or all new races to replace the 'core races'. Assume the new races are done well and not just elves or dwarves with different names.<br /> <br /> A setting where the magic system has been completely replaced (altering spells and magic items along with it).<br /> <br /> A setting where 75% or more (or even all) of the core classes have been replaced with campaign specific core classes.<br /> <br /> A setting that uses some combination of Vitality/Wound Points, Armor as DR, and/or Defense Bonus to replace the core AC and HP systems.<br /> <br /> A setting that uses one or more UA option such as Bloodlines, Paragon Classes, Weapon Groups, Craft Points, Action Points, etc...<br /> <br /> A setting that uses three or more of the above examples (or other rule changes).</li> </ul><p></p><p>I'm just wondering how far a campaign setting can generally deviate from the core rules before folks start losing interest in it as a setting they might be interested in playing in or running. I know that, regardless of how many changes are made to the rules, the setting itself (the fluff) has to be worth looking at. But, from comments I've seen from other players, I know that rule variations can make or break a game too. I'd love to get some insight as to where some of you weigh in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aristotle, post: 1717177, member: 5885"] I know their are similar threads and comments throughout the forums. I lurk more than I post so I've seen a bunch of them. Still, I've been wanting to ask this for a while now (partially out of curiosity, but also as a poorly veiled bit of marketing research). So here goes... How 'different' can a campaign setting be before you decide its strayed too far away from the game for your tastes? Do you prefer a game where nearly all of the difference is flavor and clever 'twists' in the fluff? Or can you stand a setting where changes have been made to the 'crunchy bits' of the game? If so, how far can those changes to the rules go before it crosses the line for you? [List]For instance... A setting with only one race (i.e. only humans) or all new races to replace the 'core races'. Assume the new races are done well and not just elves or dwarves with different names. A setting where the magic system has been completely replaced (altering spells and magic items along with it). A setting where 75% or more (or even all) of the core classes have been replaced with campaign specific core classes. A setting that uses some combination of Vitality/Wound Points, Armor as DR, and/or Defense Bonus to replace the core AC and HP systems. A setting that uses one or more UA option such as Bloodlines, Paragon Classes, Weapon Groups, Craft Points, Action Points, etc... A setting that uses three or more of the above examples (or other rule changes).[/list] I'm just wondering how far a campaign setting can generally deviate from the core rules before folks start losing interest in it as a setting they might be interested in playing in or running. I know that, regardless of how many changes are made to the rules, the setting itself (the fluff) has to be worth looking at. But, from comments I've seen from other players, I know that rule variations can make or break a game too. I'd love to get some insight as to where some of you weigh in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How 'different' can a setting be, for you?
Top