Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How different PC motivations support sandbox and campaign play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 7439890" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*shrug* I don't think I've ever had this problem. At least not in a few decades.</p><p></p><p>How do I do it? I run a rather harsh "old skool" style of game; the world <em>IS</em> out to kill the PC's. I, the DM, am the "world", ergo <em>I</em> am out to kill the PC's. That said, I am the world...so I don't really care one way or the other. Seems contradictory, huh? It isn't. When I DM I play the opposition as they would behave or be capable of based on a myriad of factors, most of which is "how tough does the creature <em>think </em>it is... how tough the creature <em>actually </em>is... how <em>intelligent </em>is the creature with regard figuring out when it is in a situation falling to the first or second point". Alignment plays a big part. Good creatures will avoid or try and "end it quickly". Neutral creatures are primarily driven by survival vs. danger (a risk:reward thing). Evil creatures will try to hurt/kill things whenever they think they can get away with it.</p><p></p><p>Anyway...because my games are "deadly", wealth is usually one of those "It sure would be nice to find a thousand gold pieces!" things. They are usually thinking "But honestly, I'd just rather have something other than a loincloth, a rock, and 1/4 of a water skin traipsing around in this desert after being teleported by that eff'ing crypt thing!" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Wealth? Xp? Magic Items? LOL! Keep dreaming, newb! You're first level, expect to die horribly! If adventuring was easy, everyone would be doing it!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>But if you don't run an old skool style campaign, I guess the only option is really to find out what each PLAYER wants to get out of the game, then see if it's something you would enjoy giving to them. I the Players really enjoy the mechanics side of thing, then money, equipment, magic items, 'unique' equipment/items, special training that 'breaks' the rules somehow, etc is where you'd go. If the Players really enjoy the thrill of the hunt, give them a multi-part adventure quest where each ending of a part reveils more of the puzzle and grand scheme of things. If the Players just enjoy the talking and roleplaying of it, give them special favours owed by powerful people or titles of office and things relating to the RP'ing aspect of their PC's.</p><p></p><p>I guess in short, it just relies on what the Players want. And if you don't know what they want...ask them. It really is that simple. (...or go hard-core old skool on their collective PC posteriors and just start littering the campaign landscape with the beaten and broken bodies of scores of characters...that works too... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).</p><p></p><p>As far as I'm concerned "Sandbox" and "Campaign" play is the same thing...from the perspective of the Players. They don't know (or at least <em>shouldn't</em>) that X is going to lead to Y which will end with Z. My players know that when I whip out some old module or something, that it is the "starting point". How long the player pursue that 'adventure' is based entirely upon their desires. I have had players (somewhat often, actually...call it 30%) decide that they are "done" with some particular adventure area and just wander off to some location on the world map that they thought sounded cool. My last "Kingmaker" campaign (Pathfinder, by Paizo), the PC's did the first adventure...mostly. Just as they would have started into the second they went back to the Lord (Baron? Duke? I can't remember), handed their 'writ of passage and settlement', said "So long, and thanks for all the fish!" and then left the area, heading north to Red Dragon Mountains iirc (curious to see if there were actual red dragons there...silly Players!...they should know better by now!...). That did NOT mean the campaign "ended"; it only changed the story. </p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 7439890, member: 45197"] Hiya! *shrug* I don't think I've ever had this problem. At least not in a few decades. How do I do it? I run a rather harsh "old skool" style of game; the world [I]IS[/I] out to kill the PC's. I, the DM, am the "world", ergo [I]I[/I] am out to kill the PC's. That said, I am the world...so I don't really care one way or the other. Seems contradictory, huh? It isn't. When I DM I play the opposition as they would behave or be capable of based on a myriad of factors, most of which is "how tough does the creature [I]think [/I]it is... how tough the creature [I]actually [/I]is... how [I]intelligent [/I]is the creature with regard figuring out when it is in a situation falling to the first or second point". Alignment plays a big part. Good creatures will avoid or try and "end it quickly". Neutral creatures are primarily driven by survival vs. danger (a risk:reward thing). Evil creatures will try to hurt/kill things whenever they think they can get away with it. Anyway...because my games are "deadly", wealth is usually one of those "It sure would be nice to find a thousand gold pieces!" things. They are usually thinking "But honestly, I'd just rather have something other than a loincloth, a rock, and 1/4 of a water skin traipsing around in this desert after being teleported by that eff'ing crypt thing!" ;) Wealth? Xp? Magic Items? LOL! Keep dreaming, newb! You're first level, expect to die horribly! If adventuring was easy, everyone would be doing it!:) But if you don't run an old skool style campaign, I guess the only option is really to find out what each PLAYER wants to get out of the game, then see if it's something you would enjoy giving to them. I the Players really enjoy the mechanics side of thing, then money, equipment, magic items, 'unique' equipment/items, special training that 'breaks' the rules somehow, etc is where you'd go. If the Players really enjoy the thrill of the hunt, give them a multi-part adventure quest where each ending of a part reveils more of the puzzle and grand scheme of things. If the Players just enjoy the talking and roleplaying of it, give them special favours owed by powerful people or titles of office and things relating to the RP'ing aspect of their PC's. I guess in short, it just relies on what the Players want. And if you don't know what they want...ask them. It really is that simple. (...or go hard-core old skool on their collective PC posteriors and just start littering the campaign landscape with the beaten and broken bodies of scores of characters...that works too... ;) ). As far as I'm concerned "Sandbox" and "Campaign" play is the same thing...from the perspective of the Players. They don't know (or at least [I]shouldn't[/I]) that X is going to lead to Y which will end with Z. My players know that when I whip out some old module or something, that it is the "starting point". How long the player pursue that 'adventure' is based entirely upon their desires. I have had players (somewhat often, actually...call it 30%) decide that they are "done" with some particular adventure area and just wander off to some location on the world map that they thought sounded cool. My last "Kingmaker" campaign (Pathfinder, by Paizo), the PC's did the first adventure...mostly. Just as they would have started into the second they went back to the Lord (Baron? Duke? I can't remember), handed their 'writ of passage and settlement', said "So long, and thanks for all the fish!" and then left the area, heading north to Red Dragon Mountains iirc (curious to see if there were actual red dragons there...silly Players!...they should know better by now!...). That did NOT mean the campaign "ended"; it only changed the story. ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How different PC motivations support sandbox and campaign play
Top