Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 4609574" data-attributes="member: 807">I was in a similar situation.Short version: We have our regular group (with player A), we invited a new player (player B), only to find out later that player A &amp; B actually knew each other from before and had &quot;a past&quot;.&nbsp; Player A did not like Player B, though Player B had no problem with Player A.&nbsp; It was hard to tell if Player A was just exaggerating his problems with Player B or how much the tension between them would (if at all) disrupt the game.Player A was adult enough to try it for a session.&nbsp; Though we did not tell Player B how uncomfortable Player A was with his presence.And, truthfully, Player A probably wouldn't have come back if Player B stayed for more sessions.&nbsp; But it didn't matter, Player B ended up causing certain issues that the rest of us knew wouldn't be good for the group over all on a recurring basis and wasn't invited back for session 2.So, basically, we chose one player over the other&nbsp; (though for us it was easier because Player A was an existing group member that we've known for a while and Player B was brand new to the group).&nbsp; Though it wasn't just their tension that made us choose, it was also because Player B (who was otherwise a nice enough guy) was causing other problems.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fba827, post: 4609574, member: 807"] I was in a similar situation. Short version: We have our regular group (with player A), we invited a new player (player B), only to find out later that player A & B actually knew each other from before and had "a past". Player A did not like Player B, though Player B had no problem with Player A. It was hard to tell if Player A was just exaggerating his problems with Player B or how much the tension between them would (if at all) disrupt the game. Player A was adult enough to try it for a session. Though we did not tell Player B how uncomfortable Player A was with his presence. And, truthfully, Player A probably wouldn't have come back if Player B stayed for more sessions. But it didn't matter, Player B ended up causing certain issues that the rest of us knew wouldn't be good for the group over all on a recurring basis and wasn't invited back for session 2. So, basically, we chose one player over the other (though for us it was easier because Player A was an existing group member that we've known for a while and Player B was brand new to the group). Though it wasn't just their tension that made us choose, it was also because Player B (who was otherwise a nice enough guy) was causing other problems. [/QUOTE]

Verification