Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8597976" data-attributes="member: 22779">It matters because I think you're making a lot more out of this than it needs to be.&nbsp; Since you've never actually had to do it, and never seen it done, I'm thinking that perhaps this isn't that much of a problem.&nbsp; Added to that, from what evidence we have, fudging is very common and done at probably more than half the tables out there.&nbsp; So, declaring that fudging means that you automatically leave the table, well, you might find that a bit of an issue if more than half the tables out there actually fudge.Or, to put it another way, it's very, very likely you have already played at a table where the DM fudged and you never knew.&nbsp; it's kind of like asking people if they've read 1984.&nbsp; Something like a 1/3rd of people who say yes are lying.&nbsp; Fudging is, by all accounts, quite common.&nbsp; If players refused to play at tables where the DM fudged, I think we'd hear about it quite a lot more.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8597976, member: 22779"] It matters because I think you're making a lot more out of this than it needs to be. Since you've never actually had to do it, and never seen it done, I'm thinking that perhaps this isn't that much of a problem. Added to that, from what evidence we have, fudging is very common and done at probably more than half the tables out there. So, declaring that fudging means that you automatically leave the table, well, you might find that a bit of an issue if more than half the tables out there actually fudge. Or, to put it another way, it's very, very likely you have already played at a table where the DM fudged and you never knew. it's kind of like asking people if they've read 1984. Something like a 1/3rd of people who say yes are lying. Fudging is, by all accounts, quite common. If players refused to play at tables where the DM fudged, I think we'd hear about it quite a lot more. [/QUOTE]

Verification