Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Monayuris" data-source="post: 8598619" data-attributes="member: 6859536"><p>Yeah you are getting into house rules territory which I think is a different situation.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes you have to make an on the fly ruling and sometimes you have to come up with a house rule if the rules create an undesirable outcome for the group.</p><p></p><p>Fudging to me is different. To me it is changing the outcome of a known applied rule to suit the preferred outcome of the DM.</p><p></p><p>The ability for a monster with multi attack to roll multiple crits is a known potential result of the rules. It should be implicit that it can happen and anyone playing the game should expect it if it happens.</p><p></p><p>A DM may look at the three natural twenties they rolled and think that is a little too harsh, they’ll only count one of them. That is fudging.</p><p></p><p>The DM may decide a creature can only roll one crit on a multiattack, that’s a house rule.</p><p></p><p>Generally house rules should be shared with the players and it’s perfectly ok for a DM to make the house rule on the spot and tell the players. </p><p></p><p>The DM may also just fudge it and tell the players: “I rolled three crits but I will only count one of them, because I think that is too harsh.”</p><p></p><p>I think once you have hard fast rules for fudging you are really house ruling and you should just make those rules known.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Monayuris, post: 8598619, member: 6859536"] Yeah you are getting into house rules territory which I think is a different situation. Sometimes you have to make an on the fly ruling and sometimes you have to come up with a house rule if the rules create an undesirable outcome for the group. Fudging to me is different. To me it is changing the outcome of a known applied rule to suit the preferred outcome of the DM. The ability for a monster with multi attack to roll multiple crits is a known potential result of the rules. It should be implicit that it can happen and anyone playing the game should expect it if it happens. A DM may look at the three natural twenties they rolled and think that is a little too harsh, they’ll only count one of them. That is fudging. The DM may decide a creature can only roll one crit on a multiattack, that’s a house rule. Generally house rules should be shared with the players and it’s perfectly ok for a DM to make the house rule on the spot and tell the players. The DM may also just fudge it and tell the players: “I rolled three crits but I will only count one of them, because I think that is too harsh.” I think once you have hard fast rules for fudging you are really house ruling and you should just make those rules known. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
Top