Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8600056" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>While it is true that "most people are neutral-or-positive," as in a narrow majority (53.9%), it is also true that the vast majority are neutral-or-negative (77.4%). Or, if we go with three categories instead of four--positive, neutral, negative--then the clear plurality (47.1%) is negative.</p><p></p><p>Now, before anyone replies with "this poll isn't representative!!!" I know that, I know it's not useful data for statistical reasoning. But even if this inflates the people strongly opposed by a factor of 3 and even if we <em>completely ignore</em> the somewhat-negative response, the well-established fact that a lot of DMs DO fudge runs headlong into the fact that <em>a significant number of groups have at least one player opposed to fudging.</em> If the poll is even <em>remotely</em> useful, that is if the overall population of gamers has even <em>half</em> just the highly-negative response group, then 44% of four-person groups and 52% of five-person groups would have at least one player strongly opposed to fudging. If "almost everyone" fudges, that means somewhere between 40% and 50% of groups could have a serious problem if it were revealed!</p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean...I have been pretty clear this entire time that it is a minority view, but it is a <em>substantial</em> minority view. As in, there is (as shown above) a reasonably high probability that at least one player in a randomly-selected group would have a problem. You cannot know without asking...and several of people have said that they haven't ever noticed (or been) a DM asking about it, or conversely that they presume it just <em>doesn't</em> happen and would find it a nasty surprise to know that it did/does happen.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's...not how I have ever used that phrase. "X sure is a thing" is how one intentionally avoids making any kind of assessment, positive or negative, by falling back to an utterly inarguable objective statement. Because, as I think we can all agree, fudging actually is a thing! Whether it is a good thing or a bad thing isn't specified. I meant exactly zero sarcasm with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8600056, member: 6790260"] While it is true that "most people are neutral-or-positive," as in a narrow majority (53.9%), it is also true that the vast majority are neutral-or-negative (77.4%). Or, if we go with three categories instead of four--positive, neutral, negative--then the clear plurality (47.1%) is negative. Now, before anyone replies with "this poll isn't representative!!!" I know that, I know it's not useful data for statistical reasoning. But even if this inflates the people strongly opposed by a factor of 3 and even if we [I]completely ignore[/I] the somewhat-negative response, the well-established fact that a lot of DMs DO fudge runs headlong into the fact that [I]a significant number of groups have at least one player opposed to fudging.[/I] If the poll is even [I]remotely[/I] useful, that is if the overall population of gamers has even [I]half[/I] just the highly-negative response group, then 44% of four-person groups and 52% of five-person groups would have at least one player strongly opposed to fudging. If "almost everyone" fudges, that means somewhere between 40% and 50% of groups could have a serious problem if it were revealed! I mean...I have been pretty clear this entire time that it is a minority view, but it is a [I]substantial[/I] minority view. As in, there is (as shown above) a reasonably high probability that at least one player in a randomly-selected group would have a problem. You cannot know without asking...and several of people have said that they haven't ever noticed (or been) a DM asking about it, or conversely that they presume it just [I]doesn't[/I] happen and would find it a nasty surprise to know that it did/does happen. That's...not how I have ever used that phrase. "X sure is a thing" is how one intentionally avoids making any kind of assessment, positive or negative, by falling back to an utterly inarguable objective statement. Because, as I think we can all agree, fudging actually is a thing! Whether it is a good thing or a bad thing isn't specified. I meant exactly zero sarcasm with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
Top