Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Irlo" data-source="post: 8600963" data-attributes="member: 7028372"><p>My fault -- I wasn't clear because I didn't want to write an essay. I'm not talking about maps and secret doors. I'm talking about concealing the methods of resolving actions. I'm talking about the players being in the dark about how the DM is arriving at the results of the players' proposed actions.</p><p></p><p>When I first played D&D in the early '80s, my DM ran the game from behind the screen and I had NO CLUE how he was resolving in-game activity. And I didn't care. It was all concealed from me. I didn't know about to-hit matrices. I didn't know how he was deciding if I was sneaky enough to get passed the guards undetected. If he was making stuff up, fudging numbers, or rigorously adhering to dice rolls -- it didn't matter to me and I didn't care to know. In those days, my expectation was that almost all DM stuff was intended to be concealed. (I seem to remember admonishments in the game books that players should not even peruse the DMG.)</p><p></p><p>Now, more than 35 years later, I'm in a group with a first-time player who barely knows how their own character sheet works and has no interest or particuar expectation that the DM shares the methods of resolving actions. Is it dice? Is it making up stuff? Is it occassional fudging? This new player doesn't know and doesn't care. The DM is doing what DMs do by running the game.</p><p></p><p>And no trust is broken. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's your expectation, and it's common, but it's not universal. Here's my version: <strong>the DM behind the screen is trusted to be the arbiter of in-game actions. </strong>That often involves dice. How much of the specific methods of arbitration are revealed to players differs from table to table. By all means, have the conversation about how you plan to run the game (or how you want the DM to run the game). If a DM tells you they're running a strict let-the-dice-fall-where-they-may campaign, the DM should abide by that. If they don't agree to that, it doesn't make them liars or show a lack of integrity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Irlo, post: 8600963, member: 7028372"] My fault -- I wasn't clear because I didn't want to write an essay. I'm not talking about maps and secret doors. I'm talking about concealing the methods of resolving actions. I'm talking about the players being in the dark about how the DM is arriving at the results of the players' proposed actions. When I first played D&D in the early '80s, my DM ran the game from behind the screen and I had NO CLUE how he was resolving in-game activity. And I didn't care. It was all concealed from me. I didn't know about to-hit matrices. I didn't know how he was deciding if I was sneaky enough to get passed the guards undetected. If he was making stuff up, fudging numbers, or rigorously adhering to dice rolls -- it didn't matter to me and I didn't care to know. In those days, my expectation was that almost all DM stuff was intended to be concealed. (I seem to remember admonishments in the game books that players should not even peruse the DMG.) Now, more than 35 years later, I'm in a group with a first-time player who barely knows how their own character sheet works and has no interest or particuar expectation that the DM shares the methods of resolving actions. Is it dice? Is it making up stuff? Is it occassional fudging? This new player doesn't know and doesn't care. The DM is doing what DMs do by running the game. And no trust is broken. That's your expectation, and it's common, but it's not universal. Here's my version: [B]the DM behind the screen is trusted to be the arbiter of in-game actions. [/B]That often involves dice. How much of the specific methods of arbitration are revealed to players differs from table to table. By all means, have the conversation about how you plan to run the game (or how you want the DM to run the game). If a DM tells you they're running a strict let-the-dice-fall-where-they-may campaign, the DM should abide by that. If they don't agree to that, it doesn't make them liars or show a lack of integrity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do players feel about DM fudging?
Top