Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How do we account for healing (and related abilities) for "min-max" or "powergaming"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Skallgrim" data-source="post: 5012662" data-attributes="member: 79271"><p>I can only speak from my own experience (and the postings of others that I vaguely remember), but:</p><p></p><p>If your party knows to expect say, 4 encounters each day, then they can easily budget their healing surges (divide by 4). They know that if they "save up" one from the first fight, they can use it in fight 2 or 3. They know how many encounter level heals the leaders have, and how many they will need to use as a second wind. They can plan on using healing surges after each fight but the last one, where they know that they will be able to take an extended rest.</p><p></p><p>All of that information and planning allows the party to use healing in the most optimal way in each encounter. They don't waste surges, and they don't waste daily heals.</p><p></p><p>If, on the other hand, there is more uncertainty, then the party can't always be assured of making the most optimal choice in each encounter. If they <em>think</em> that there will be more encounters than there actually are, they may conserve healing or surges and play defensively when they actually could go on offense. If they guess wrong and there are more encounters than they are expecting, then they might find themselves short on surges or extra daily heals in the last fights.</p><p></p><p>Giving the players meta-game knowledge like "We always get 4 encounters and an extended rest" allows them to manage their resources more effectively, thus increasing the effectiveness of healing, even though all the healing powers are the same as before.</p><p></p><p>If Ranger Bob has one healing surge left, but knows that after this fight, he can safely take an extended rest, there's no reason NOT to use a Healing Word during the fight to keep his 'HP buffer' full. If, on the other hand, he might be able to take a rest, or might need to press on, he might want to save that surge, put away his bastard swords of doom, and hide behind a rock and shoot some arrows. This reduces his effectiveness in the fight, in order to allow him to participate in another fight more effectively. If there is another fight, that decision was probably wise. If there isn't, then he reduced his effectiveness in this one for no gain.</p><p></p><p>That's why, in my experience, an "expected adventuring day length", increases the efficacy of healing. (Note that I am assuming this is a rational expectation from the players, and not "I never had any idea that you might have more encounters, sneaky DM, even though you've done it twelve times before!")</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Skallgrim, post: 5012662, member: 79271"] I can only speak from my own experience (and the postings of others that I vaguely remember), but: If your party knows to expect say, 4 encounters each day, then they can easily budget their healing surges (divide by 4). They know that if they "save up" one from the first fight, they can use it in fight 2 or 3. They know how many encounter level heals the leaders have, and how many they will need to use as a second wind. They can plan on using healing surges after each fight but the last one, where they know that they will be able to take an extended rest. All of that information and planning allows the party to use healing in the most optimal way in each encounter. They don't waste surges, and they don't waste daily heals. If, on the other hand, there is more uncertainty, then the party can't always be assured of making the most optimal choice in each encounter. If they [I]think[/I] that there will be more encounters than there actually are, they may conserve healing or surges and play defensively when they actually could go on offense. If they guess wrong and there are more encounters than they are expecting, then they might find themselves short on surges or extra daily heals in the last fights. Giving the players meta-game knowledge like "We always get 4 encounters and an extended rest" allows them to manage their resources more effectively, thus increasing the effectiveness of healing, even though all the healing powers are the same as before. If Ranger Bob has one healing surge left, but knows that after this fight, he can safely take an extended rest, there's no reason NOT to use a Healing Word during the fight to keep his 'HP buffer' full. If, on the other hand, he might be able to take a rest, or might need to press on, he might want to save that surge, put away his bastard swords of doom, and hide behind a rock and shoot some arrows. This reduces his effectiveness in the fight, in order to allow him to participate in another fight more effectively. If there is another fight, that decision was probably wise. If there isn't, then he reduced his effectiveness in this one for no gain. That's why, in my experience, an "expected adventuring day length", increases the efficacy of healing. (Note that I am assuming this is a rational expectation from the players, and not "I never had any idea that you might have more encounters, sneaky DM, even though you've done it twelve times before!") [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How do we account for healing (and related abilities) for "min-max" or "powergaming"?
Top