Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="vulcan_idic" data-source="post: 3007995" data-attributes="member: 19615">I have to agree with Quasqueton.  Given the original post and this piece of information from the original poster: "Is it really a dragon? If it's not, then I am going to be really angry. Our very first commune question was: Q: Is (name of creature) a red dragon? A: Yes. That was the only straight^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H direct answer we've received."  I have the following hypothesis.Is <assumed acurate name> really a dragon? answer yes.  Based on the assumption that the name which we now know actually applies to some dragon of some type somewhere we start asking about the nature of said dragon.  There are ways that this could occur while negating other information gathering systems - a soultrapped dragon and/or a powerful half-dragon mage (which still has the dragon type so may well be considered by the higher power to *be* a dragon or a powerful mage who soultrapped the real dragon) who is doing everything in their power to present themselves as the reknowned dragon <assumed acurate name>.  How close was the bronze who saw the theoretical red, but knows nothing else about it?  Could it have seen an illusion?  If it's interaction with the illusion was insufficient it may never have had the opportunity to save against it.  What do you *really* know about what's going on?  What is hearsay or could be misleading information either intentionally or unwittingly on the part of the source?  Who are the sources?  What is the effect of the Dragon threat?  Are there any who are benefitting from those effects?  Question your assumptions and perceptions.  "When you have eleimanted the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."</blockquote>

Verification