Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Emerikol" data-source="post: 8254523" data-attributes="member: 6698278">I think traditionally D&amp;D has not handled rules wise the higher levels very well.&nbsp; I houseruled more high level things than I did low level things.&nbsp;&nbsp; It depends on the flavor of the game.For one,I limited the range of scrying, teleport, clairvoyance/clairaudience, and such.&nbsp;&nbsp; A lot!There is more administration of NPCs and world events but I find the payoff is greater unlike [USER=85870]@innerdude[/USER] My players always seem to have personal goals and the group tends to cater to those goals so everyone is helped along at advancing some agenda.&nbsp;&nbsp; I do tend to have a world that while not full of high level characters is not bereft of them either especially in larger nations and cities.&nbsp;&nbsp; So the group while almost super heroic in many ways at high levels, can't just roll over entire kingdoms without serious opposition.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Emerikol, post: 8254523, member: 6698278"] I think traditionally D&D has not handled rules wise the higher levels very well. I houseruled more high level things than I did low level things. It depends on the flavor of the game. For one, I limited the range of scrying, teleport, clairvoyance/clairaudience, and such. A lot! There is more administration of NPCs and world events but I find the payoff is greater unlike [USER=85870]@innerdude[/USER] My players always seem to have personal goals and the group tends to cater to those goals so everyone is helped along at advancing some agenda. I do tend to have a world that while not full of high level characters is not bereft of them either especially in larger nations and cities. So the group while almost super heroic in many ways at high levels, can't just roll over entire kingdoms without serious opposition. [/QUOTE]

Verification