Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Do you Feel About Healing Surges? (Read First!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 5903322"><p>I am not saying these are his reasons. I am saying there are reasons why someone might be okay with saves but not healing surges and interogating them for a perceived inconsistency just intensifies the hostility (and aggressive rhetoric just intimidates it doesn't illuminate). </p><p></p><p>I can see that you are troubled by perceived insults. If that is your issue with a poster, then mention you think these labels are unfair. But most of us who criticize 4e do so becuase it genuinely doesn't appeal to us (some of us find it unrealistic, but that isn't true of all pposters). </p><p></p><p>I have been pretty consistent all along. All i feel anyone is obligated to give is their preference. They don't need to go into minute self examination of their inner motives. You are adept at socratic questioning, but I really think it is unproductive in these cases. People who are not aquainted with rhetoric will be easy pickings, but that doesn't make them any less right in their position (it just means they don't know how to handle a well constructed line of debate).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>and no one is trying to articulate a robust theory of rpging. They are just giving their preferences. It is possible to want more simulationsist mechanics in D&D but to also accept the established mechanics that are less simulationist simply because they are accustomed to them. So again, someone could reject HS on simulationist grounds, but be okay with saves remaining in the game. It may just be a matter of not wanting to add in more stuff they find dissassociative ( i dont mean this as an insult, it is just a handy decription for why certain mechanics rub me the wrong way----and i understand some maybnot find them dissassociative at all). </p><p></p><p>I realize folks take these debates seriously. But I really think we need to take a step back and not take it so personally when peoples' preferences differ from our own (or feel insulted if someone thinks our prefered edition isn't balanced, is not realistic, or just isn't fun).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 5903322"] I am not saying these are his reasons. I am saying there are reasons why someone might be okay with saves but not healing surges and interogating them for a perceived inconsistency just intensifies the hostility (and aggressive rhetoric just intimidates it doesn't illuminate). I can see that you are troubled by perceived insults. If that is your issue with a poster, then mention you think these labels are unfair. But most of us who criticize 4e do so becuase it genuinely doesn't appeal to us (some of us find it unrealistic, but that isn't true of all pposters). I have been pretty consistent all along. All i feel anyone is obligated to give is their preference. They don't need to go into minute self examination of their inner motives. You are adept at socratic questioning, but I really think it is unproductive in these cases. People who are not aquainted with rhetoric will be easy pickings, but that doesn't make them any less right in their position (it just means they don't know how to handle a well constructed line of debate). and no one is trying to articulate a robust theory of rpging. They are just giving their preferences. It is possible to want more simulationsist mechanics in D&D but to also accept the established mechanics that are less simulationist simply because they are accustomed to them. So again, someone could reject HS on simulationist grounds, but be okay with saves remaining in the game. It may just be a matter of not wanting to add in more stuff they find dissassociative ( i dont mean this as an insult, it is just a handy decription for why certain mechanics rub me the wrong way----and i understand some maybnot find them dissassociative at all). I realize folks take these debates seriously. But I really think we need to take a step back and not take it so personally when peoples' preferences differ from our own (or feel insulted if someone thinks our prefered edition isn't balanced, is not realistic, or just isn't fun). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Do you Feel About Healing Surges? (Read First!)
Top