Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do YOU handle a Fastball Special, and other team manuevers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 7588573" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>Thread is what it says on the tin. </p><p></p><p>Most takes on how to handle a fastball special that I've seen are too complicated, punish the attempt with two many rolls that can result in total failure of the move (often effectively triple or quadruple disadvantage), or restrict the manuever to the point where it'd be simpler to just say "no, you can't do that in this game". </p><p></p><p>What I'd like is a take wherein each participant makes exactly 1 check, and both have to fail for it to be a total failure, with the chance of a mixed success if half or more participants fail. </p><p></p><p>So, for a fastball special, </p><p></p><p> I'll get to action economy of joint maneuvers later in the post. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p><p></p><p> Throw distance equal to the higher of the thrown creature's or the thrower's Strength Score in feet.</p><p></p><p>Half that number if you don't do anything to help the throw, if the thrown creature is unwilling, or if the creature being thrown is heavier than the weight the thrower can carrying without being encumbered. The thrown creature can help by moving at least 10 feet, ending in the thrower's space, before the throw, or by adopting a ball-like shape to make themselves a more easily handled package. </p><p></p><p>Add 5ft for every category by which the thrower is larger than the thrown creature, using the thrower's effective size for determining carrying capacity, if it is different from it's actual size. (ie, a Goliath adds 5ft when throwing another medium creature, or 10ft when throwing a gnome or halfling. A fellow Goliath might half the total distance they can be thrown, if their weight is greater than what the thrower can carry without encumberance)</p><p></p><p>A check to aim the throw and determine any bonus distance is made by the thrower, using Strength (Athletics). If it succeeds, the thrown creature is thrown into the space occupied by the target. DC is equal to the half the distance thrown in feet. A DM might decide that this is instead a ranged attack with a thrown weapon, if the thrower is sufficiently strong, and sufficiently larger than the thrown creature. </p><p></p><p>The thrown creature then makes an attack roll against the target. They can either gain advantage on that attack, or choose to deal 1d6 extra damage per ten feet they were thrown. They can instead choose to make a Shove attack, using either their Acrobatics or Athletics check.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I like that, but <strong>what about the action economy?</strong> </p><p></p><p>I figure the thrown creature uses their Action to take the Readied Action to make their attack, and part of their movement (5ft plus whatever they have to move to get adjacent to the thrower), and then uses a Reaction to make the attack when the thrower uses an action to throw them? <strong>Is that too restrictive/costly?</strong> I rarely see any Battle Master Fighters take Commander's Strike unless it's houseruled to be less costly in action economy terms, as a comparative example. Perhaps it's a bonus action to set up the throw? </p><p></p><p>Would you give a bonus to the throw check if the thrown creature is trained in Acrobatics? Handle the attack differently? Perhaps an opposed check, like grappling but with both parties choosing between Acrobatics and Athletics? </p><p></p><p>Has anyone determined an even simpler way of handling any and all joint manuevers? </p><p></p><p>In general, I think they should only ever require 1 check per participant, and should strongly feature the possibility of success with a setback or "price to pay" in pbta terms. Maybe treat it exactly as a group check, but with 1/2 exactly being mixed success? </p><p></p><p>Do any other joint maneuvers come up in your games? If you have a fairly simply system for adjudicating them, what is it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 7588573, member: 6704184"] Thread is what it says on the tin. Most takes on how to handle a fastball special that I've seen are too complicated, punish the attempt with two many rolls that can result in total failure of the move (often effectively triple or quadruple disadvantage), or restrict the manuever to the point where it'd be simpler to just say "no, you can't do that in this game". What I'd like is a take wherein each participant makes exactly 1 check, and both have to fail for it to be a total failure, with the chance of a mixed success if half or more participants fail. So, for a fastball special, I'll get to action economy of joint maneuvers later in the post. [B]Conclusion:[/B] Throw distance equal to the higher of the thrown creature's or the thrower's Strength Score in feet. Half that number if you don't do anything to help the throw, if the thrown creature is unwilling, or if the creature being thrown is heavier than the weight the thrower can carrying without being encumbered. The thrown creature can help by moving at least 10 feet, ending in the thrower's space, before the throw, or by adopting a ball-like shape to make themselves a more easily handled package. Add 5ft for every category by which the thrower is larger than the thrown creature, using the thrower's effective size for determining carrying capacity, if it is different from it's actual size. (ie, a Goliath adds 5ft when throwing another medium creature, or 10ft when throwing a gnome or halfling. A fellow Goliath might half the total distance they can be thrown, if their weight is greater than what the thrower can carry without encumberance) A check to aim the throw and determine any bonus distance is made by the thrower, using Strength (Athletics). If it succeeds, the thrown creature is thrown into the space occupied by the target. DC is equal to the half the distance thrown in feet. A DM might decide that this is instead a ranged attack with a thrown weapon, if the thrower is sufficiently strong, and sufficiently larger than the thrown creature. The thrown creature then makes an attack roll against the target. They can either gain advantage on that attack, or choose to deal 1d6 extra damage per ten feet they were thrown. They can instead choose to make a Shove attack, using either their Acrobatics or Athletics check. I like that, but [B]what about the action economy?[/B] I figure the thrown creature uses their Action to take the Readied Action to make their attack, and part of their movement (5ft plus whatever they have to move to get adjacent to the thrower), and then uses a Reaction to make the attack when the thrower uses an action to throw them? [B]Is that too restrictive/costly?[/B] I rarely see any Battle Master Fighters take Commander's Strike unless it's houseruled to be less costly in action economy terms, as a comparative example. Perhaps it's a bonus action to set up the throw? Would you give a bonus to the throw check if the thrown creature is trained in Acrobatics? Handle the attack differently? Perhaps an opposed check, like grappling but with both parties choosing between Acrobatics and Athletics? Has anyone determined an even simpler way of handling any and all joint manuevers? In general, I think they should only ever require 1 check per participant, and should strongly feature the possibility of success with a setback or "price to pay" in pbta terms. Maybe treat it exactly as a group check, but with 1/2 exactly being mixed success? Do any other joint maneuvers come up in your games? If you have a fairly simply system for adjudicating them, what is it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do YOU handle a Fastball Special, and other team manuevers?
Top