Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Fieari" data-source="post: 5998818" data-attributes="member: 16221">Hrm.&nbsp; What were the names based on?&nbsp; A naming scheme would help...20th or 21st, I suspect.&nbsp; To be honest, they may even try it sooner, and IF they succeed, it'd push them straight into epic.I'm statting the Umbral as a level 25 Super-Solo.&nbsp; The party is actually highly optimized, so it's pretty normal for me to throw level+4 or +5 at them, and have them win (with difficulty).&nbsp; As of last session, the players are level 17.Oh, and earlier you mentioned something about Negative Dimensions.&nbsp; What would that even MEAN?!&nbsp; Cardinality is actually one of the few mathematical concepts that doesn't have a negative.&nbsp; Likewise with dimensionality, except dimensions at least have fractions-- but those aren't spacial dimensions, instead a way of referring to different types of fractals.&nbsp; If a negative dimension is just like a positive dimension except certain things are flipped around, I'd think it'd be easier to sit it as a plane within briah instead.&nbsp; That's what briah's for, after all.Another thought would be, instead of a negative dimension, to have it wrap around to the 10th dimension... or even the 11th (akashic records).&nbsp; Maybe a negative akashic library, where everything that DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER EXISTED, and CAN NOT EXIST, EVEN IN IMAGINATION is written down?&nbsp; It would contain everything the akashic records don't.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Fieari, post: 5998818, member: 16221"] Hrm. What were the names based on? A naming scheme would help... 20th or 21st, I suspect. To be honest, they may even try it sooner, and IF they succeed, it'd push them straight into epic. I'm statting the Umbral as a level 25 Super-Solo. The party is actually highly optimized, so it's pretty normal for me to throw level+4 or +5 at them, and have them win (with difficulty). As of last session, the players are level 17. Oh, and earlier you mentioned something about Negative Dimensions. What would that even MEAN?! Cardinality is actually one of the few mathematical concepts that doesn't have a negative. Likewise with dimensionality, except dimensions at least have fractions-- but those aren't spacial dimensions, instead a way of referring to different types of fractals. If a negative dimension is just like a positive dimension except certain things are flipped around, I'd think it'd be easier to sit it as a plane within briah instead. That's what briah's for, after all. Another thought would be, instead of a negative dimension, to have it wrap around to the 10th dimension... or even the 11th (akashic records). Maybe a negative akashic library, where everything that DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER EXISTED, and CAN NOT EXIST, EVEN IN IMAGINATION is written down? It would contain everything the akashic records don't. [/QUOTE]

Verification