Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 5943537" data-attributes="member: 1165">Shouldn't this be a poll.No, not for martial types.No, not in place of. If a PC has a choice between bull rush and hit, they hit. If they have a choice between bull rush and Tide of Iron/Hammer Hands, they use the latter, since they get both benefits <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Of course, this does mean anyone without the requisite power or feat doesn't use bull rush without extreme circumstances... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />I like.I like a lot. Instead of 2 free extra attacks per day, maybe once per encounter instead.Being able to do something on a crit is pretty cool and flavorful. For instance, if you dazed an opponent when you crit with an unarmed attack or a hammer attack. I have qualms about the balance though; it seems too weak as it's not coming up, and it encourages crit-fishing. (I like to think that won't be an issue in D&DN, but the game's not done yet.)No... if you start adding options to this it's pretty much powers under another name. No options goes back to "I hit to attack" over and over again.</blockquote>

Verification