Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7286726" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Librantheloth.&nbsp; Because the resistance and vulnerability have the same wording, either approach is going to play out between them in a more or less balanced way if vulnerabilities and resistances are equally common. If its all one mish mesh simple, vulnerabilities will do more for mixed attacks just like resistances reduce more. I dont have a problem sering the difference in wording as saying #1 and #2 can stack (+1 +1 +1 = +3) all together but #3 and #4 can only,multiply once (x2 x2 = x2) and that making sense and being significant without also reading into it (regardless of type vs type as long as one type matches.)It seems inherently sensible that vuln to shock will not multiply bludgeon damage just because it comes in with some shock damage as well.But that is an added bit of work that not all would find worthwhile.. Sent from my VS995 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7286726, member: 6919838"] Librantheloth. Because the resistance and vulnerability have the same wording, either approach is going to play out between them in a more or less balanced way if vulnerabilities and resistances are equally common. If its all one mish mesh simple, vulnerabilities will do more for mixed attacks just like resistances reduce more. I dont have a problem sering the difference in wording as saying #1 and #2 can stack (+1 +1 +1 = +3) all together but #3 and #4 can only,multiply once (x2 x2 = x2) and that making sense and being significant without also reading into it (regardless of type vs type as long as one type matches.) It seems inherently sensible that vuln to shock will not multiply bludgeon damage just because it comes in with some shock damage as well. But that is an added bit of work that not all would find worthwhile.. Sent from my VS995 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification