NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DMZ2112" data-source="post: 6420256" data-attributes="member: 78752">It's my understanding that Mythic tiers are earned independently of class levels.  I believe they are event driven rather than experience point driven, with each tier being earned after an increasing number of "mythic trials."I'm not sure how I feel about D&D5 prestige classes in general.  I don't have a categorical objection to leveling beyond 20 -- I didn't have an objection to it in D&D3 either -- but I don't want there to be a artificial break at 20th level.  For that matter I don't want there to be an artificial break /before/ 20th level that permits advancement beyond 20.I do like the idea of further class specialization after 3rd level, but I haven't really considered what this looks like yet.The fact that I can't discourse effectively about irrelevancies.This would be in keeping with the spirit of D&D5 if not the spirit of historical Epic options.These are both the same thing, and they are both examples of "more and larger" numerical amplitude increases.  No sale.No, but I can see how you reached that conclusion.  I mean that a +20 is not equivalent to an automatic success in D20 because it is possible to fail /legitimately/, without rolling a critical failure, when you have a +20 bonus to a d20 roll.  The fact that there are DCs that high in D20 -- and that there are characters with bonuses ample enough to match them --  is just crazy.Agreed.  I have no complaint with critical success or failure.  Although I am not certain they are standard rules in D20.  I thought D20 only officially counted critical success and failure as they apply to combat rolls.</blockquote>

Verification