Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How does a game work without skills?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Korgoth" data-source="post: 4532287" data-attributes="member: 49613"><p>Very true.</p><p></p><p>My preferred approach to the matter of skills is just to go with what is reasonable to the character. If a character is known to be keen-eyed, or is an Elf, then he spots whatever is to be spotted first. We don't have to roll to spot something unless it's an ambush... and that's already covered in the Surprise roll. A clever ambush might offer a 1 point advantage in surprising or being surprised, or even both if it is particularly good.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, a surprise roll can handle stealth if it needs to be rolled for. A Fighting Man wants to sneak through the main room of a temple while the cultists are all chanting and looking in the other direction. The Fighting Man cannot be surprised; if he "surprises" the cultists then he moves through successfully. He might gain one or more points on the die as a circumstantial bonus (bonus if he's unarmored/unencumbered, bonus if the cultists are really absorbed in what they're doing, bonus if it's shadowy, etc.). If he just tries to waltz through in armor, though, he's taking his life into his own hands (but it may work).</p><p></p><p>I prefer "descriptive searching" to the alternate method of skill rolling that was introduced in Supplement I: Greyhawk. Here's how it worked the other night in my Empire of the Petal Throne (1975) game:</p><p></p><p>Scene: The PCs have entered a tomb chamber with a sarcophagus. They pried it open and surprised a Vorodla (winged undead warrior) inside. After a short fight they slew it. The sarcophagus appears empty.</p><p></p><p>Player: "I search the sarcophagus."</p><p>DM: "How closely?"</p><p>Player: "I want to feel the bottom, make sure it's the right height and so on."</p><p>DM: "Do you want to actually climb <em>into</em> the sarcophagus? It's pretty big."</p><p>Player: [pauses] "I climb inside it and search."</p><p>DM: "You find a small stone knob or button in the bottom."</p><p></p><p>My adjudication was that in the flickering torchlight, the button could not be seen from standing outside the sarcophagus (it was too well hidden and the lighting too flickery). However, someone up close on the inside would find it.</p><p></p><p>So this was a decision point in the game: does Player risk his character by entering a possibly deadly sarcophagus? He saw no evidence that it would be deadly (no eldritch apparatus or pool of slime or anything like that... just dry stone) so he decided it was worth the risk. In some cases there would have been nothing to find. But they knew they had not found a treasure cache in this entire tomb sub-complex and so Player figured on a payoff. And he was correct... although treasure room behind the secret door was very dangerous itself!</p><p></p><p>Further, characters can be understood to have reasonable areas of knowledge and mundane expertise. A character in my EPT game was a boat builder. When trying to sell a boat the party had, I just let him know what a good price was. He didn't have to roll or guess... he is trained in that, so he knows it. Another character is an alchemist and dye-maker who knows rocks and plants. In a partially-collapsed room he tried to evaluate whether the ceiling was dangerous. "You're not an engineer" I told him.</p><p></p><p>It can all be handled with common sense and a minimum of die rolling. I game to reveal hidden places in the gameworld and to let my players display their ingenuity and cleverness. I could care less if someone is able to roll high.</p><p></p><p>I think rolls should be used sparingly, and only at moments of high drama.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Korgoth, post: 4532287, member: 49613"] Very true. My preferred approach to the matter of skills is just to go with what is reasonable to the character. If a character is known to be keen-eyed, or is an Elf, then he spots whatever is to be spotted first. We don't have to roll to spot something unless it's an ambush... and that's already covered in the Surprise roll. A clever ambush might offer a 1 point advantage in surprising or being surprised, or even both if it is particularly good. Likewise, a surprise roll can handle stealth if it needs to be rolled for. A Fighting Man wants to sneak through the main room of a temple while the cultists are all chanting and looking in the other direction. The Fighting Man cannot be surprised; if he "surprises" the cultists then he moves through successfully. He might gain one or more points on the die as a circumstantial bonus (bonus if he's unarmored/unencumbered, bonus if the cultists are really absorbed in what they're doing, bonus if it's shadowy, etc.). If he just tries to waltz through in armor, though, he's taking his life into his own hands (but it may work). I prefer "descriptive searching" to the alternate method of skill rolling that was introduced in Supplement I: Greyhawk. Here's how it worked the other night in my Empire of the Petal Throne (1975) game: Scene: The PCs have entered a tomb chamber with a sarcophagus. They pried it open and surprised a Vorodla (winged undead warrior) inside. After a short fight they slew it. The sarcophagus appears empty. Player: "I search the sarcophagus." DM: "How closely?" Player: "I want to feel the bottom, make sure it's the right height and so on." DM: "Do you want to actually climb [i]into[/i] the sarcophagus? It's pretty big." Player: [pauses] "I climb inside it and search." DM: "You find a small stone knob or button in the bottom." My adjudication was that in the flickering torchlight, the button could not be seen from standing outside the sarcophagus (it was too well hidden and the lighting too flickery). However, someone up close on the inside would find it. So this was a decision point in the game: does Player risk his character by entering a possibly deadly sarcophagus? He saw no evidence that it would be deadly (no eldritch apparatus or pool of slime or anything like that... just dry stone) so he decided it was worth the risk. In some cases there would have been nothing to find. But they knew they had not found a treasure cache in this entire tomb sub-complex and so Player figured on a payoff. And he was correct... although treasure room behind the secret door was very dangerous itself! Further, characters can be understood to have reasonable areas of knowledge and mundane expertise. A character in my EPT game was a boat builder. When trying to sell a boat the party had, I just let him know what a good price was. He didn't have to roll or guess... he is trained in that, so he knows it. Another character is an alchemist and dye-maker who knows rocks and plants. In a partially-collapsed room he tried to evaluate whether the ceiling was dangerous. "You're not an engineer" I told him. It can all be handled with common sense and a minimum of die rolling. I game to reveal hidden places in the gameworld and to let my players display their ingenuity and cleverness. I could care less if someone is able to roll high. I think rolls should be used sparingly, and only at moments of high drama. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How does a game work without skills?
Top