Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How Does Greyhawk Fit In To The New Edition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="timbannock" data-source="post: 9346233" data-attributes="member: 17913"><p>Obviously "it's bad" is subjective, but I think you miss why people think "it's good":</p><p></p><p>Greyhawk is a setting where most of the nations are locked in a cold war, and several are locked in a hot one. Armies are constantly clashing, domains are constantly up for grabs. Evil with a capital "E" is rampant, and evil without the capital "E" is pretty much everywhere. Mercenaries aren't just common, they are necessary, otherwise civilization will fall, or become a decadent mess as it has in about 3 or 4 of the current "greatest" nations. Basically, everything is in decline.</p><p></p><p>The reason this is popular among the folks that like it is because it's the first real points of light setting with all that entails, but also because it jives 100% perfectly with the original thrust of D&D: that fortunes are won by mercenaries, and fortunes are exactly how you level up. That was the whole of the D&D reward cycle, and Greyhawk perfectly fit it.</p><p></p><p>Now...whether or not the reward cycle has anything to do with how D&D works today, I think we can all say "nope" pretty readily. But I'll posit that the bleakness, the mercenary focus, and the warring kingdoms still make for a good backdrop, even if the PCs are now no longer mercenaries but heroes and do-gooders.</p><p></p><p><strong>Rant</strong>: People constantly say "Greyhawk is more swords & sorcery" (than presumably FR, I'm guessing the comparison goes?), but if you look at basically everything that's been published for it, I'd argue that's only passingly true, a relative statement that's not entirely indicative of the truth. Greyhawk's still, at its core, MUCH more high fantasy than Conan and a lot of the source material. Monsters and magic abound in far, far greater amounts than people give it credit for. Just roll some random stuff on the OD&D or B/X era tables to see what I mean. But importantly, everything in 2E and later is way, way higher fantasy. /rant</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="timbannock, post: 9346233, member: 17913"] Obviously "it's bad" is subjective, but I think you miss why people think "it's good": Greyhawk is a setting where most of the nations are locked in a cold war, and several are locked in a hot one. Armies are constantly clashing, domains are constantly up for grabs. Evil with a capital "E" is rampant, and evil without the capital "E" is pretty much everywhere. Mercenaries aren't just common, they are necessary, otherwise civilization will fall, or become a decadent mess as it has in about 3 or 4 of the current "greatest" nations. Basically, everything is in decline. The reason this is popular among the folks that like it is because it's the first real points of light setting with all that entails, but also because it jives 100% perfectly with the original thrust of D&D: that fortunes are won by mercenaries, and fortunes are exactly how you level up. That was the whole of the D&D reward cycle, and Greyhawk perfectly fit it. Now...whether or not the reward cycle has anything to do with how D&D works today, I think we can all say "nope" pretty readily. But I'll posit that the bleakness, the mercenary focus, and the warring kingdoms still make for a good backdrop, even if the PCs are now no longer mercenaries but heroes and do-gooders. [B]Rant[/B]: People constantly say "Greyhawk is more swords & sorcery" (than presumably FR, I'm guessing the comparison goes?), but if you look at basically everything that's been published for it, I'd argue that's only passingly true, a relative statement that's not entirely indicative of the truth. Greyhawk's still, at its core, MUCH more high fantasy than Conan and a lot of the source material. Monsters and magic abound in far, far greater amounts than people give it credit for. Just roll some random stuff on the OD&D or B/X era tables to see what I mean. But importantly, everything in 2E and later is way, way higher fantasy. /rant [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How Does Greyhawk Fit In To The New Edition?
Top