Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 1377396" data-attributes="member: 284">No, that doesn't make any sense at all. Qualifying for the prerequisite for a feat is different than being a legal target for the effect the feat produces. Yes, the monk's unarmed strike is a legal target for the "improved damage" effect that the feat produces.  But that does not mean that it also counts as a natural weapon for qualifying for the feat.  They are two different things. You keep saying that they are the same thing, but haven't actually produced any support for that statement. You are saying that a prerequisite for a feat is the same thing as the effect produced by the feat. I'm just wondering how you reach that conclusion. Please, where does it state this, anywhere in the rules?</blockquote>