Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wedgeski" data-source="post: 6714038" data-attributes="member: 16212">I am not a lawyer, an expert, or anything in between. No-one can talk in specifics because the only way to talk in specifics would be to have a 5E open license to refer to. That said, I can give you some opinions.No. If you posted the complete contents of the Monster Manual on your web site, even if you insist you're not making money off it, you will likely (and rightfully) attract the ire. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />But, an adventure written for your friends and posted on your blog is different than publishing it on a digital marketplace and making money off it. Several publishers do that safely (it would appear), including ENWorld's own EN5ider, but they know exactly how to tread the line.All that being said, WotC have only actively gone after people re-publishing their rules material (such as digital game aids with monsters, spell lists, etc.), at least as far as I know.Yes, pretty much.That's incorrect. It's a free version of the game, not a system reference document.I seriously doubt it.</blockquote>