Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How does the errata on hiding affect the mask of the wild ability of the wood elf?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 6641818" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p><em>‘<span style="color: #000080">When you are hiding</span>’.</em></p><p></p><p>When you hide - when you decide to hide - when you are in the process of hiding yourself - even before you become hidden.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><strong>Errata: Using Ability Scores: Hiding (p. 177).</strong> The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding. Also, the question isn’t whether a creature can see you </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>when you’re hiding</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>. The question is whether it can see you clearly.</em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"></span></p><p>So, ‘when you’re hiding’, you can do so even when a creature partially sees you. As long as the creature can’t see you clearly, go head. Hide.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><strong>PH 177 Textbox: Hiding.</strong> </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>When you try to hide</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>, make a Dexterity (Stealth) check. Until you are discovered or you stop hiding, that check’s total is contested by the Wisdom (Perception) check of any creature that actively searches for signs of your presence.</em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></span></p><p>The textbox says, ‘you can’t hide from a creature that can see you’. But the erratum precisely overrides this sentence, to clarify, you can hide from it as long as this creature can’t ‘see you clearly’.</p><p><span style="color: #808080"></span></p><p> <span style="color: #808080"></span><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><span style="color: #000080">You can’t hide from a creature that can see you</span><span style="color: #808080">, and if you make noise (such as shouting a warning or knocking over a vase), you give away your position.</span></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></p><p>Oh, but you can hide from a creature that can see you! As long as the creature can’t see you clearly, it is ok.</p><p></p><p>There is no requirement to be out of line-of-sight, when attempting to hide or when being hidden. Notice the original context of this sentence. ‘You can’t hide from a creature that can see you’, applies in a context when you are already hidden. Thus, if you happen to be in line-of-sight in any way, the creature would automatically discover you. Similarly, if you make noise like shouting, the creature will discover you. The erratum clarifies that you can remain hidden, even during the line-of-sight of a creature that you are hidden from, as long as that creature can’t see you clearly. The point is: you can try to hide while being not being seen clearly, and you can remain hidden while not being seen clearly.</p><p></p><p>There is never a requirement to be completely unseen. It is still possible to hide.</p><p></p><p>You can hide at any time, as long as you can’t be seen ‘clearly’.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Note, you can even ‘come out of hiding’ to attack someone and still ‘stay hidden’ (!) - as long as you can’t be seen clearly. A creature that is ‘distracted’ also can’t see you ‘clearly’.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>... In combat, most creatures stay alert for signs of danger all around, so </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>if you come out of hiding</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em> and approach a creature, it usually sees you. However, under certain circumstances, the Dungeon Master might allow </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>you to stay hidden</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em> as you approach a creature that is distracted, allowing you to gain advantage on an attack before you are seen.</em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></span></p><p>The possibility of hiding during partial visibility makes it much more useful during combat.</p><p></p><p>It seems to me, the intent of the errata was to make the Dex Stealth check of the Rogue more powerful. The Rogue becomes able to attack and then hide again in the same round, thus being able to ‘stealth kite’. At high levels, this is as powerful as a Wizard who fights while invisible and levitating or flying. The difference is, the Rogue can pull off this stunt without using magic.</p><p></p><p>The extra powerful Rogue is working as intended. It is a feature, not a bug.</p><p></p><p>The problem is, the authorship of the erratum focusing on the Rogue, forgot about the obscure wording of the racial feature of the Wood Elf. Which is fine, the features of the Wood Elf and especially the features of the High Elf are kinda lame, and probably need a boost anyway.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Finally, there is only one check. That Dex Stealth check applies versus all Wis Perception checks, whether active or passive, when unseen or at least not seen clearly.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><span style="color: #808080"><strong>PH 177: Dexterity: Stealth.</strong> Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check </span><span style="color: #000080">when you attempt to conceal yourself </span><span style="color: #808080">from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.</span></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></p><p>There is only one Dexterity Stealth check to hide. This one result applies in all circumstances. It doesn’t matter if the check happens while a creature can see you - as long as the creature can’t see you clearly the check is in effect.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><strong>Passive Perception.</strong> </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>When you hide</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>, there’s a chance someone will notice you even if they aren't searching. To determine whether such a creature notices you, the DM compares your Dexterity (Stealth) check with that creature’s passive Wisdom (Perception) score, which equals 10 + the creature’s Wisdom modifier, as well as any other bonuses or penalties. ...</em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em><strong>What Can You See?</strong> One of the main factors in determining whether you can </em></span></span><span style="color: #000080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em>find a hidden creature</em></span></span><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em> or object is how well you can see in an area, which might be lightly or heavily obscured, as explained in chapter 8.</em></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #808080"><span style="font-size: 10px"><em></em></span></span></p><p>So, a Rogue who is stealth-kiting a creature that has low Wisdom Perception, is very effective, indeed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 6641818, member: 58172"] [I]‘[COLOR=#000080]When you are hiding[/COLOR]’.[/I] When you hide - when you decide to hide - when you are in the process of hiding yourself - even before you become hidden. [COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I][B]Errata: Using Ability Scores: Hiding (p. 177).[/B] The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding. Also, the question isn’t whether a creature can see you [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]when you’re hiding[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I]. The question is whether it can see you clearly.[/I][/SIZE] [/COLOR] So, ‘when you’re hiding’, you can do so even when a creature partially sees you. As long as the creature can’t see you clearly, go head. Hide. [COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I][B]PH 177 Textbox: Hiding.[/B] [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]When you try to hide[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I], make a Dexterity (Stealth) check. Until you are discovered or you stop hiding, that check’s total is contested by the Wisdom (Perception) check of any creature that actively searches for signs of your presence. [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR] The textbox says, ‘you can’t hide from a creature that can see you’. But the erratum precisely overrides this sentence, to clarify, you can hide from it as long as this creature can’t ‘see you clearly’. [COLOR=#808080] [/COLOR][SIZE=2][I][COLOR=#000080]You can’t hide from a creature that can see you[/COLOR][COLOR=#808080], and if you make noise (such as shouting a warning or knocking over a vase), you give away your position.[/COLOR] [/I][/SIZE] Oh, but you can hide from a creature that can see you! As long as the creature can’t see you clearly, it is ok. There is no requirement to be out of line-of-sight, when attempting to hide or when being hidden. Notice the original context of this sentence. ‘You can’t hide from a creature that can see you’, applies in a context when you are already hidden. Thus, if you happen to be in line-of-sight in any way, the creature would automatically discover you. Similarly, if you make noise like shouting, the creature will discover you. The erratum clarifies that you can remain hidden, even during the line-of-sight of a creature that you are hidden from, as long as that creature can’t see you clearly. The point is: you can try to hide while being not being seen clearly, and you can remain hidden while not being seen clearly. There is never a requirement to be completely unseen. It is still possible to hide. You can hide at any time, as long as you can’t be seen ‘clearly’. Note, you can even ‘come out of hiding’ to attack someone and still ‘stay hidden’ (!) - as long as you can’t be seen clearly. A creature that is ‘distracted’ also can’t see you ‘clearly’. [COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I]... In combat, most creatures stay alert for signs of danger all around, so [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]if you come out of hiding[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I] and approach a creature, it usually sees you. However, under certain circumstances, the Dungeon Master might allow [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]you to stay hidden[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I] as you approach a creature that is distracted, allowing you to gain advantage on an attack before you are seen. [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR] The possibility of hiding during partial visibility makes it much more useful during combat. It seems to me, the intent of the errata was to make the Dex Stealth check of the Rogue more powerful. The Rogue becomes able to attack and then hide again in the same round, thus being able to ‘stealth kite’. At high levels, this is as powerful as a Wizard who fights while invisible and levitating or flying. The difference is, the Rogue can pull off this stunt without using magic. The extra powerful Rogue is working as intended. It is a feature, not a bug. The problem is, the authorship of the erratum focusing on the Rogue, forgot about the obscure wording of the racial feature of the Wood Elf. Which is fine, the features of the Wood Elf and especially the features of the High Elf are kinda lame, and probably need a boost anyway. Finally, there is only one check. That Dex Stealth check applies versus all Wis Perception checks, whether active or passive, when unseen or at least not seen clearly. [SIZE=2][I][COLOR=#808080][B]PH 177: Dexterity: Stealth.[/B] Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check [/COLOR][COLOR=#000080]when you attempt to conceal yourself [/COLOR][COLOR=#808080]from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.[/COLOR] [/I][/SIZE] There is only one Dexterity Stealth check to hide. This one result applies in all circumstances. It doesn’t matter if the check happens while a creature can see you - as long as the creature can’t see you clearly the check is in effect. [COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I][B]Passive Perception.[/B] [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]When you hide[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I], there’s a chance someone will notice you even if they aren't searching. To determine whether such a creature notices you, the DM compares your Dexterity (Stealth) check with that creature’s passive Wisdom (Perception) score, which equals 10 + the creature’s Wisdom modifier, as well as any other bonuses or penalties. ... [B]What Can You See?[/B] One of the main factors in determining whether you can [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#000080][SIZE=2][I]find a hidden creature[/I][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080][SIZE=2][I] or object is how well you can see in an area, which might be lightly or heavily obscured, as explained in chapter 8. [/I][/SIZE][/COLOR] So, a Rogue who is stealth-kiting a creature that has low Wisdom Perception, is very effective, indeed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How does the errata on hiding affect the mask of the wild ability of the wood elf?
Top