Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How does the errata on hiding affect the mask of the wild ability of the wood elf?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flamestrike" data-source="post: 6643608" data-attributes="member: 6788736"><p>If you want to rule that light obscurement = 'cant be seen clearly enough' then go for it. It's certainly arguable.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I would rule that one needs something more than just light obscurement. The observer to be distracted (by combat for example).</p><p></p><p>And it does nothing to 'gut' the abilities. They remain as useful as always. They greatly widen the range of stuff a Wood Elf or Halfling can hide 'in' (where an Orc or Human could not). A Human rogue needs to first 'not be seen clearly' and second needs to get himself into cover or total obscurement to hide. A Wood elf needs only to 'not be seen clearly' and then he can hide in any natural obscurement in addition to total obscurement and cover.</p><p></p><p>Before the errata, it was virtually impossible to use the Hide action in combat (barring before combat began) as creatures are assumed to observe all other creatures involved in a combat. This errata ruling loosens that restriction allowing creatures to hide even while under casual observation when the observer is sufficiently distracted.</p><p></p><p>Remember - MoTW doesnt allow the Elf to circumvent the restriction on hiding while under observation. It simply widens the scope of things the Elf can hide 'in' when a creature cannot see the Elf 'clearly enough'.</p><p></p><p>And I can see an Elf standing behind a ficus or in the rain, as clearly as I can see a human or an orc. If light obscurement is enough to allow a Stealth check to hide for an Elf (by having that light obscurement enough to obscure vision to the point that the observer cannot see the elf 'clearly enough'), the light obscurement of the ficus also allows an Orc standing behind the ficus to make a Stealth check to hide.</p><p></p><p>The only difference being the Orc needs to move into full cover to hide whereas the Elf can remain behind the ficus and hide.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Youre interpreting 'cant be seen clearly enough' as 'direct observation'. That's not the wording used. You dont have to be focusing intently on the creature who wants to hide from you to prevent the attempt. You only need to be able to see them 'clearly enough'. </p><p></p><p>It's up to each DM to determine what being able to 'see someone clearly enough' means. Personally I use a common sense interpretation (if the creature can see you clearly enough to know where you are, and can observe you going into your hiding spot, you cannot hide from that creature - it knows where you are).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flamestrike, post: 6643608, member: 6788736"] If you want to rule that light obscurement = 'cant be seen clearly enough' then go for it. It's certainly arguable. Personally, I would rule that one needs something more than just light obscurement. The observer to be distracted (by combat for example). And it does nothing to 'gut' the abilities. They remain as useful as always. They greatly widen the range of stuff a Wood Elf or Halfling can hide 'in' (where an Orc or Human could not). A Human rogue needs to first 'not be seen clearly' and second needs to get himself into cover or total obscurement to hide. A Wood elf needs only to 'not be seen clearly' and then he can hide in any natural obscurement in addition to total obscurement and cover. Before the errata, it was virtually impossible to use the Hide action in combat (barring before combat began) as creatures are assumed to observe all other creatures involved in a combat. This errata ruling loosens that restriction allowing creatures to hide even while under casual observation when the observer is sufficiently distracted. Remember - MoTW doesnt allow the Elf to circumvent the restriction on hiding while under observation. It simply widens the scope of things the Elf can hide 'in' when a creature cannot see the Elf 'clearly enough'. And I can see an Elf standing behind a ficus or in the rain, as clearly as I can see a human or an orc. If light obscurement is enough to allow a Stealth check to hide for an Elf (by having that light obscurement enough to obscure vision to the point that the observer cannot see the elf 'clearly enough'), the light obscurement of the ficus also allows an Orc standing behind the ficus to make a Stealth check to hide. The only difference being the Orc needs to move into full cover to hide whereas the Elf can remain behind the ficus and hide. Youre interpreting 'cant be seen clearly enough' as 'direct observation'. That's not the wording used. You dont have to be focusing intently on the creature who wants to hide from you to prevent the attempt. You only need to be able to see them 'clearly enough'. It's up to each DM to determine what being able to 'see someone clearly enough' means. Personally I use a common sense interpretation (if the creature can see you clearly enough to know where you are, and can observe you going into your hiding spot, you cannot hide from that creature - it knows where you are). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How does the errata on hiding affect the mask of the wild ability of the wood elf?
Top