Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 2786698" data-attributes="member: 5100">The core books are the baseline assumption.  Errata is usually adopted, but subject to review on a line-by-line basis.  Everything else is considered a house rule or variant, with the entirety of, say, "Complete Arcane" being considered no more manditory than anything in "Unearthed Arcana".When errata or a new book is published that contradicts existing mechanics, it is reviewed (by one or two players and me) and either adopted or discarded.  That's not so much of a formal process as it is just the way things work out because of who pays attension to such things.Sage Advice/the FAQ are considered nothing more than advice from an expert.  It is not something a rules lawyer could glom onto, by any means.  But, it might help a player make a case for a rules adjustment at some point -- maybe.  Basically, it's just food for thought.</blockquote>