Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TerraDave" data-source="post: 5288627" data-attributes="member: 22260">I guess I have that .5 in my sig...so lets go with that. If you had a ranger or a bard in 3.0 you could still play that charecter, it just changed with 3.5 (and probably got better). I mean, that was always true. I guess way back your lawfull neutral dwarf paladin might suddenly become illegal, but that has not been an issue for the last decade. In a related vein, some options you didn't take may now get better. For me, no big deal, but for other people this matters. With 3.5 half elves became arguably the best bards, now maybe it will be eladrins. Again, I don't care, but some optimizers our there might. As for your last point, someone may actually do the breakdown. I don't think it is that far appart. Each was dozens and dozens of little changes and a few big ones. Of course, the approach to phasing in these changes in different, as I noted in my first post.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TerraDave, post: 5288627, member: 22260"] I guess I have that .5 in my sig...so lets go with that. If you had a ranger or a bard in 3.0 you could still play that charecter, it just changed with 3.5 (and probably got better). I mean, that was always true. I guess [I]way back [/I]your lawfull neutral dwarf paladin might suddenly become illegal, but that has not been an issue for the last decade. In a related vein, some options you didn't take may now get better. For me, no big deal, but for other people this matters. With 3.5 half elves became arguably the best bards, now maybe it will be eladrins. Again, I don't care, but some optimizers our there might. As for your last point, someone may actually do the breakdown. I don't think it is that far appart. Each was dozens and dozens of little changes and a few big ones. Of course, the approach to phasing in these changes in different, as I noted in my first post. [/QUOTE]

Verification