Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Essentials and beyond is a ...zucchini...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5288719" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Not really the same. If I had a 3.0 ranger, when 3.5 came out, I had to make changes on my character sheet. I have to adjust my hitpoints. My skill points. Some skills were blended into others. Other skills became class features for me. My key class features underwent significant changes. </p><p> </p><p>With Essentials, if I have a ranger, my character sheet remains the same. The existence of a new build - even one that changes 'default assumptions of the system' doesn't affect my existing character. The changes to racial ability scores doesn't affect me - my existing ability scores remain legal choices. </p><p> </p><p>They've added new options without invalidating existing characters. That's the big difference, and why the claim of compatability remains true. </p><p> </p><p>Now, yes, there are some legitimate genuine changes to existing elements - Infernal Wrath, Magic Missile, Melee Training, and various errata that has come before for existing powers, feats, etc. </p><p> </p><p>But I think it has been on a smaller scale. I think that few have changed things as fundamentally as some of the class changes and spell changes in 3.0 to 3.5. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Sure, but how is this different than... any supplement, ever? By this logic, every single book released for the game is a new 'edition' because some options might be better than others? I don't particularly buy that line of thought. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I think it is a lot farther than you believe. There just haven't been that many 'big ones' that had as deep an impact on characters. There have been some, but a change to, say, one paragon path or one fighter build, doesn't feel nearly as extensive as a change to a base class like ranger. There have been a good number of powers with errata - but not nearly as extreme the changes to spells.</p><p> </p><p>I mean, spells changed levels, class lists, names, and many underwent much more fundamental revision. Changes in buff duration, haste, polymorph spells - those affected entire styles of play. As compared to powers that... had some numbers shifted up or down, or a limit placed on how many attacks you could get. And more than that - most classes in 3.5 drew on the same spell list, so changing those spells affected the bulk of spell-casting classes. Since powers are unique to each class in 4E, any given change to a power applies to a much smaller number of characters. </p><p> </p><p>We've had a couple that are wider reaching, such as Tiefling's Infernal Wrath. </p><p> </p><p>But like I said - a Tiefling with PHB Infernal Wrath, alongside one with Updated Infernal Wrath, won't feel nearly as different as someone with 3.0 Haste vs 3.5 Haste.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5288719, member: 61155"] Not really the same. If I had a 3.0 ranger, when 3.5 came out, I had to make changes on my character sheet. I have to adjust my hitpoints. My skill points. Some skills were blended into others. Other skills became class features for me. My key class features underwent significant changes. With Essentials, if I have a ranger, my character sheet remains the same. The existence of a new build - even one that changes 'default assumptions of the system' doesn't affect my existing character. The changes to racial ability scores doesn't affect me - my existing ability scores remain legal choices. They've added new options without invalidating existing characters. That's the big difference, and why the claim of compatability remains true. Now, yes, there are some legitimate genuine changes to existing elements - Infernal Wrath, Magic Missile, Melee Training, and various errata that has come before for existing powers, feats, etc. But I think it has been on a smaller scale. I think that few have changed things as fundamentally as some of the class changes and spell changes in 3.0 to 3.5. Sure, but how is this different than... any supplement, ever? By this logic, every single book released for the game is a new 'edition' because some options might be better than others? I don't particularly buy that line of thought. I think it is a lot farther than you believe. There just haven't been that many 'big ones' that had as deep an impact on characters. There have been some, but a change to, say, one paragon path or one fighter build, doesn't feel nearly as extensive as a change to a base class like ranger. There have been a good number of powers with errata - but not nearly as extreme the changes to spells. I mean, spells changed levels, class lists, names, and many underwent much more fundamental revision. Changes in buff duration, haste, polymorph spells - those affected entire styles of play. As compared to powers that... had some numbers shifted up or down, or a limit placed on how many attacks you could get. And more than that - most classes in 3.5 drew on the same spell list, so changing those spells affected the bulk of spell-casting classes. Since powers are unique to each class in 4E, any given change to a power applies to a much smaller number of characters. We've had a couple that are wider reaching, such as Tiefling's Infernal Wrath. But like I said - a Tiefling with PHB Infernal Wrath, alongside one with Updated Infernal Wrath, won't feel nearly as different as someone with 3.0 Haste vs 3.5 Haste. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Essentials and beyond is a ...zucchini...
Top