Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How fantastic are natural 1's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8123949" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Sure, no problem.</p><p></p><p>Nope, not a Monty Haul problem -- that one involves asking the same question but gaining information between asks. This is about knowing which question you're asking.</p><p></p><p>For instance, the odds of rolling a 1 on any given d20 roll is always 5%. Never changes, no matter how many times we roll. Similarly, the average number of 1's we roll over a sample of size n is also going to be 5%. Average is doing a lot of work here, though. In you earlier example, you were absolutely right that the expected average number of fumbles in 400 d20 rolls is 20. Perfectly true, but, again, average is doing a lot of work there. As I pointed out, 95% of the time the results of 400 die rolls will be between 13 and 27 fumbles, with approximately 9% of all 400 roll trials resulting in exactly 20 fumbles. So, when you ask the question about what the average number of fumbles you'd get with 400 rolls, the answer to that is that the average number is 20. Not, mind, the number you'll get, but the average if you did it an infinite number of times.</p><p></p><p>When you switch to looking at a single round, or even sets of single rounds, you've changed the question. Now we're looking at 4 rolls or sets of 4 rolls. This is a different distribution of probabilities. Even if you had 100 sets, equating to 400 rolls, the question is about the sets, not about the total population. You'll have many sets with zero fumbles, some with 1, less with 2, very few with 3, and maybe 1 with all four (unlikely). So, the average value of the sets having a fumble occur is different from asking what the total number of fumbles over 400 rolls is, and you get a different answer. The trick with probability is being very specific with your questions and not confusing similar questions as being the same -- they're most likely not, even if apparently similar.</p><p></p><p>Here's another example about how averages are not telling you what you think they might be -- if you ran a trial of 10,000 d20 rolls, the average expected value of fumbles is 500. The odds of actually getting 500 fumbles in a single trial, though, is 1.8%. The probability function is spread out over a wide area, but is a bell curve centered on 500, so it's average will be that. But, you really shouldn't actually expect to get 500 fumbles.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 8123949, member: 16814"] Sure, no problem. Nope, not a Monty Haul problem -- that one involves asking the same question but gaining information between asks. This is about knowing which question you're asking. For instance, the odds of rolling a 1 on any given d20 roll is always 5%. Never changes, no matter how many times we roll. Similarly, the average number of 1's we roll over a sample of size n is also going to be 5%. Average is doing a lot of work here, though. In you earlier example, you were absolutely right that the expected average number of fumbles in 400 d20 rolls is 20. Perfectly true, but, again, average is doing a lot of work there. As I pointed out, 95% of the time the results of 400 die rolls will be between 13 and 27 fumbles, with approximately 9% of all 400 roll trials resulting in exactly 20 fumbles. So, when you ask the question about what the average number of fumbles you'd get with 400 rolls, the answer to that is that the average number is 20. Not, mind, the number you'll get, but the average if you did it an infinite number of times. When you switch to looking at a single round, or even sets of single rounds, you've changed the question. Now we're looking at 4 rolls or sets of 4 rolls. This is a different distribution of probabilities. Even if you had 100 sets, equating to 400 rolls, the question is about the sets, not about the total population. You'll have many sets with zero fumbles, some with 1, less with 2, very few with 3, and maybe 1 with all four (unlikely). So, the average value of the sets having a fumble occur is different from asking what the total number of fumbles over 400 rolls is, and you get a different answer. The trick with probability is being very specific with your questions and not confusing similar questions as being the same -- they're most likely not, even if apparently similar. Here's another example about how averages are not telling you what you think they might be -- if you ran a trial of 10,000 d20 rolls, the average expected value of fumbles is 500. The odds of actually getting 500 fumbles in a single trial, though, is 1.8%. The probability function is spread out over a wide area, but is a bell curve centered on 500, so it's average will be that. But, you really shouldn't actually expect to get 500 fumbles. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How fantastic are natural 1's?
Top