Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 1824559" data-attributes="member: 5890">First up, I'm all for the "if it's more fun" school of DMing. However whenever I'm considering a new ruling, I always considerDoes it make the game faster?Does it make the game more realistic?Does it make the game more fun?If a new ruling gets 2 out of 3, it's in.Then you revoke it. You say to the players "That new rule we're using has these bad consequences, so I'm revoking/changing it".Which, as others have pointed out, is perfectly legal.See - I fail to understand how giving someone a permanent +1 to their saves is increasing the fun of the game. It seems more like breaking a rule for the hell of it.I really don't see how that's a problem.Again, it seems to be fine by the RAW, as well as a cool visual with minimal deleterious effects.Yeah, well the polymorph rules are rooted, especially with the sage's "clarifications" which make polymorphing into an Ooze so totally stupid it defies belief. If I thought they were going to be a problem in my campaign any time soon, I'd probably work with the casters of the spells and sort something out.</blockquote>