Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Fleshed out IS PoL going to be?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orius" data-source="post: 3959508" data-attributes="member: 8863"><p>I've already been saying over the last few day that too much of an implied setting hurts the homebrewer.</p><p></p><p>I can accept that not all homebrewers want something that just cribs from Greyhawk and/or Mystara, even the Realms. But then those homebrewers might not <strong>also</strong> want Bael Turath, GWA, and so on. That's the point that's being missed here. It's not a matter of Gary's old fluff being excised from the game so people have more freedom to develop their campaigns, it's Gary's fluff being replaced with another set of fluff.</p><p></p><p>Then there's the axing of all those old settings back during the end of 2e. They were dividing up the D&D base and hurting sales overall. Now with 4e, the designers are coming with all this implied setting material. Why do we need yet another generic D&D setting? We already have Greyhawk, Mystara, the Realms, and even Eberron. What happened to the many buckets theory? We definitely don't need a <em>fifth</em> generic setting to evolve out of this fluff.</p><p></p><p> If a default setting is needed in the books, and Greyhawk isn't cutting it any more, why not just make the Realms the official default and be done with it? The game was already heading in that direction during 2e. When WotC took over and tried to appease the fans that had been burned by T$R's bad public relations, they tried to restore Greyhawk to the official setting but that just didn't work out. Is it going to matter how pissed the old Greyhawk fans are going to be any more, especially if they haven't bought anything new in 20 years? They're probably either using the old 1e rules or C&C and getting new material from canonfire. It's a bit of a shame to see Greyhawk die out like this, but it's already been given several chances. The Realms sell, so use them. If a short chapter is needed in say the DMG to help DM's get started in a Realms game, I don't mind. And if people need a setting book, well the Realms book will be coming out about the same time as the core books, right? I'm not really interested in running the Realms myself, but I can easily ignore Realms fluff. I'm not sure how easy this new stuff will really be to ignore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orius, post: 3959508, member: 8863"] I've already been saying over the last few day that too much of an implied setting hurts the homebrewer. I can accept that not all homebrewers want something that just cribs from Greyhawk and/or Mystara, even the Realms. But then those homebrewers might not [b]also[/b] want Bael Turath, GWA, and so on. That's the point that's being missed here. It's not a matter of Gary's old fluff being excised from the game so people have more freedom to develop their campaigns, it's Gary's fluff being replaced with another set of fluff. Then there's the axing of all those old settings back during the end of 2e. They were dividing up the D&D base and hurting sales overall. Now with 4e, the designers are coming with all this implied setting material. Why do we need yet another generic D&D setting? We already have Greyhawk, Mystara, the Realms, and even Eberron. What happened to the many buckets theory? We definitely don't need a [i]fifth[/i] generic setting to evolve out of this fluff. If a default setting is needed in the books, and Greyhawk isn't cutting it any more, why not just make the Realms the official default and be done with it? The game was already heading in that direction during 2e. When WotC took over and tried to appease the fans that had been burned by T$R's bad public relations, they tried to restore Greyhawk to the official setting but that just didn't work out. Is it going to matter how pissed the old Greyhawk fans are going to be any more, especially if they haven't bought anything new in 20 years? They're probably either using the old 1e rules or C&C and getting new material from canonfire. It's a bit of a shame to see Greyhawk die out like this, but it's already been given several chances. The Realms sell, so use them. If a short chapter is needed in say the DMG to help DM's get started in a Realms game, I don't mind. And if people need a setting book, well the Realms book will be coming out about the same time as the core books, right? I'm not really interested in running the Realms myself, but I can easily ignore Realms fluff. I'm not sure how easy this new stuff will really be to ignore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Fleshed out IS PoL going to be?
Top