Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How free are you with a Freedom of Movement Spell?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michaluk" data-source="post: 3657926" data-attributes="member: 45232"><p>The wording on the spell is very confusing. "Move and attack normally" basically doesn't mean anything, since you're always moving and attacking normally given the specific situation you're in. A character in thick underbrush moves and attacks normally for a character in thick underbrush. What does "normally" mean? Does it mean "as if the character was on flat ground"? Does it mean "As if the character was on flat ground and unencumbered"? etc.</p><p></p><p>Looking at the next part of the spell is more informative. "even under the influence of magic ...". The "even" part implies that the spell also applies to similar, non-magical effects. So the spell allows the character to disregard the effects of magical and non-magical paralysis as well as effects similar to solid fog, slow and web.</p><p></p><p>The next paragraph starts with "The spell also enables" and then goes on to talk about moving underwater. Notice that this is an additional effect ("also" is used), not a continuation of the above effect. In this section, moving and attacking normally is made more explicit by the example of someone swinging a club underwater implicitly as if they were on dry land. The implication then is that "normally" means on dry land. So one could, if he chose (they use the term "enables" rather than something like "forces") walk unimpeded along the bottom of a lake, swinging away with his great sword. Note however that moving normally requires a hard surface, so the character could not move normally through water if he's not touching the bottom. Even though he could still swing his weapon mostly normally without a firm footing (maybe I'd give a -2 or -4 to attack), moving around without touching the ground still requires a swim check.</p><p></p><p>This second paragraph applies only to water, not every medium your character may be traveling through. Therefore something like a strong wind, in my opinion, would not be covered by this and would continue to affect the character.</p><p></p><p>For those who think the wind should not affect the character, here's my reductio ad absurdum. You are arguing either:</p><p>1) The effect of the wind is covered by the first paragraph and you can "move normally" through it.</p><p>or</p><p>2) The wind is covered by a logical extension of the second paragraph about water, and therefore as long as you're on a hard surface (the bridge) you can "move normally" through it.</p><p></p><p>If your argument is (1), then the character could also "move normally" through solid rock, since it is just another thing that stops normal movement and is therefore neutralized by the spell. I don't think anyone believes the spell allows a character to do this.</p><p></p><p>If you argument is (2), then the character can "move normally" through any medium. Therefore they can, here it comes, move normally through solid rock. In fact, since they're always on a hard surface, they could "float" through however they pleased, effects of gravity not considered. Once again, I don't think anyone believes the spell allows a character to do this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michaluk, post: 3657926, member: 45232"] The wording on the spell is very confusing. "Move and attack normally" basically doesn't mean anything, since you're always moving and attacking normally given the specific situation you're in. A character in thick underbrush moves and attacks normally for a character in thick underbrush. What does "normally" mean? Does it mean "as if the character was on flat ground"? Does it mean "As if the character was on flat ground and unencumbered"? etc. Looking at the next part of the spell is more informative. "even under the influence of magic ...". The "even" part implies that the spell also applies to similar, non-magical effects. So the spell allows the character to disregard the effects of magical and non-magical paralysis as well as effects similar to solid fog, slow and web. The next paragraph starts with "The spell also enables" and then goes on to talk about moving underwater. Notice that this is an additional effect ("also" is used), not a continuation of the above effect. In this section, moving and attacking normally is made more explicit by the example of someone swinging a club underwater implicitly as if they were on dry land. The implication then is that "normally" means on dry land. So one could, if he chose (they use the term "enables" rather than something like "forces") walk unimpeded along the bottom of a lake, swinging away with his great sword. Note however that moving normally requires a hard surface, so the character could not move normally through water if he's not touching the bottom. Even though he could still swing his weapon mostly normally without a firm footing (maybe I'd give a -2 or -4 to attack), moving around without touching the ground still requires a swim check. This second paragraph applies only to water, not every medium your character may be traveling through. Therefore something like a strong wind, in my opinion, would not be covered by this and would continue to affect the character. For those who think the wind should not affect the character, here's my reductio ad absurdum. You are arguing either: 1) The effect of the wind is covered by the first paragraph and you can "move normally" through it. or 2) The wind is covered by a logical extension of the second paragraph about water, and therefore as long as you're on a hard surface (the bridge) you can "move normally" through it. If your argument is (1), then the character could also "move normally" through solid rock, since it is just another thing that stops normal movement and is therefore neutralized by the spell. I don't think anyone believes the spell allows a character to do this. If you argument is (2), then the character can "move normally" through any medium. Therefore they can, here it comes, move normally through solid rock. In fact, since they're always on a hard surface, they could "float" through however they pleased, effects of gravity not considered. Once again, I don't think anyone believes the spell allows a character to do this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How free are you with a Freedom of Movement Spell?
Top