Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8607829" data-attributes="member: 6855114">No I did not dismiss anything. You perceive it as such because it is a style you like and you play (probably, here I assume) à more redined version of what I had played back then. If you read carefully,  you will notice that in my answers to [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER], I am actually curious about the more refined concept. You take my posts for attacks, while they ate not. I am telling this board, that back then my experience with the genre was not a positive one and all that I saw was newbies trying to push the "I win" button. From other posters, it seems that this genre does incur this risks. Maybe not in your games, that is great! But your experience does not make it the ultimate truth nor does mine make the genre useless and bland. I am just stating my perception of it now. I did say that [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER] brought more to make me reconsider but I would need to try it. And to try it, a GM of such a system must be nearby, which is not the case in my area.Again, you think my posts are dismissive and yet, I said more than once that I would be opened to try. I think you see my criticism a tad bit too personal. Just like when I criticise somethings about 5ed that some believe that I hate 5ed. In some thread I am a hater of 5ed, in others, like this one, it seems that I am it's herald... go figure...</blockquote>