Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How have you improved as a DM?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7497179" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>I think this is partly a case of expectations. Also system. </p><p></p><p>Do you expect that a skill check activity can go wrong or just not go good?</p><p></p><p>Can a failed climbing check lead to a fall & loss of gained height or only not advance your climb any farther? </p><p></p><p>Can a failed investigate check give you a false lead with an inaccurate clue or just not give you any result to go on?</p><p></p><p>Similarly, can a failed insight check give you false impressions or just give you inconclusive results?</p><p></p><p>To me, since it is deception vs insight it seems obvious that its not just "do i see signs of lying" but also "do i see signs of being truthful". That creates a neutral ground of "cant tell either way." If that is the case, then it would seem to me that "he seems to be being sincere" is a valid response. </p><p></p><p>Now maybe you wont believe that and no matter what you werent gonna believe him, if so, why roll? No matter whst the result your going to be in the same place - i dont believe him. Why roll to stand still?</p><p></p><p>But in 5e a failure result is defined for ability checks as "makes no progress towards the objective or makes progress with setback determined by GM." PHB under Ability checks. </p><p></p><p>That would seem to allow the result of an insight failure to include "he seems to be lying" even if he is being truthful about most things (setback is picking up minor lie as the full read) or "he seems to be truthful" if he is lying (setback being only picking up the signs of truth for the bits that were, missing the tells that mattered.)</p><p></p><p>Or imagine a investigation check vs a rune set depicting some ancient lore.</p><p></p><p>Success shows George and Barry went hunting Orange Bog Serpent and killed it but after in dispute over claiming kill George kills Barry. </p><p></p><p>Failure PWS might give you George and Barry went hunting Orange Bog Serpent and killed it but **unknown bits** kills Barry. Could even be more explicitly misread as Serpent killed Barry with "some stuff still unclear."</p><p></p><p>Or the failure could be "no progress" and give you nothing.</p><p></p><p>But in 5e the ability check opens up **both** of those possible failure results by RAW - pws or np.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7497179, member: 6919838"] I think this is partly a case of expectations. Also system. Do you expect that a skill check activity can go wrong or just not go good? Can a failed climbing check lead to a fall & loss of gained height or only not advance your climb any farther? Can a failed investigate check give you a false lead with an inaccurate clue or just not give you any result to go on? Similarly, can a failed insight check give you false impressions or just give you inconclusive results? To me, since it is deception vs insight it seems obvious that its not just "do i see signs of lying" but also "do i see signs of being truthful". That creates a neutral ground of "cant tell either way." If that is the case, then it would seem to me that "he seems to be being sincere" is a valid response. Now maybe you wont believe that and no matter what you werent gonna believe him, if so, why roll? No matter whst the result your going to be in the same place - i dont believe him. Why roll to stand still? But in 5e a failure result is defined for ability checks as "makes no progress towards the objective or makes progress with setback determined by GM." PHB under Ability checks. That would seem to allow the result of an insight failure to include "he seems to be lying" even if he is being truthful about most things (setback is picking up minor lie as the full read) or "he seems to be truthful" if he is lying (setback being only picking up the signs of truth for the bits that were, missing the tells that mattered.) Or imagine a investigation check vs a rune set depicting some ancient lore. Success shows George and Barry went hunting Orange Bog Serpent and killed it but after in dispute over claiming kill George kills Barry. Failure PWS might give you George and Barry went hunting Orange Bog Serpent and killed it but **unknown bits** kills Barry. Could even be more explicitly misread as Serpent killed Barry with "some stuff still unclear." Or the failure could be "no progress" and give you nothing. But in 5e the ability check opens up **both** of those possible failure results by RAW - pws or np. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How have you improved as a DM?
Top