Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Hit Points Ruin SoD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Siran Dunmorgan" data-source="post: 4830594" data-attributes="member: 39268"><p>Since ancient days, I have understood hit points to be something of a useful legacy of miniatures games in which each figure physically present on the game table represented more than one actual creature in play.</p><p></p><p>To wit, the example of a simple Norman infantryman, wearing a conical helm with nose-piece, a long coat of chain mail, and carrying a shield and spear. In the old days, a single metal figure of such would represent perhaps ten men. However, only two of these men would actually be considered to be on the line of battle at any given time. If the figure takes a hit, one of the men in the front rank is assumed to have been removed from the battle, and a man from the next rank is assumed to step up to take his place. Only after nine men have been removed from the battle, i.e. the figure has taken nine hits, will the combat effectiveness of the figure be impaired, and it will, of course, be eliminated entirely after it has taken ten hits. Figures representing more men required correspondingly more hits to be removed from battle.</p><p></p><p>This system was carried through, intact, when dealing with figures that represented a single individual. In such cases, the figure was assumed to be somehow tougher, stronger, and better able to "shrug off" damage than other men, but this was simply a gloss to explain why such a figure could, of itself, take multiple hits, where each hit was normally sufficient to drop a normal soldier.</p><p></p><p>The modern concept of hit points is a legacy of this system.</p><p></p><p>Rationalizing the effect of this in-game has never been an issue at our table: we take Gygax' word for it as quoted above. Warlord healing—most healing, in fact, including bard and cleric—is normally rationalized as the healer's encouragement allowing us to realize that our wounds weren't really as bad as we'd originally thought, e.g. it looks like a bloody mess, and had us worried for a bit, but the cut itself turned out not to be that deep.</p><p></p><p>—Siran Dunmorgan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Siran Dunmorgan, post: 4830594, member: 39268"] Since ancient days, I have understood hit points to be something of a useful legacy of miniatures games in which each figure physically present on the game table represented more than one actual creature in play. To wit, the example of a simple Norman infantryman, wearing a conical helm with nose-piece, a long coat of chain mail, and carrying a shield and spear. In the old days, a single metal figure of such would represent perhaps ten men. However, only two of these men would actually be considered to be on the line of battle at any given time. If the figure takes a hit, one of the men in the front rank is assumed to have been removed from the battle, and a man from the next rank is assumed to step up to take his place. Only after nine men have been removed from the battle, i.e. the figure has taken nine hits, will the combat effectiveness of the figure be impaired, and it will, of course, be eliminated entirely after it has taken ten hits. Figures representing more men required correspondingly more hits to be removed from battle. This system was carried through, intact, when dealing with figures that represented a single individual. In such cases, the figure was assumed to be somehow tougher, stronger, and better able to "shrug off" damage than other men, but this was simply a gloss to explain why such a figure could, of itself, take multiple hits, where each hit was normally sufficient to drop a normal soldier. The modern concept of hit points is a legacy of this system. Rationalizing the effect of this in-game has never been an issue at our table: we take Gygax' word for it as quoted above. Warlord healing—most healing, in fact, including bard and cleric—is normally rationalized as the healer's encouragement allowing us to realize that our wounds weren't really as bad as we'd originally thought, e.g. it looks like a bloody mess, and had us worried for a bit, but the cut itself turned out not to be that deep. —Siran Dunmorgan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Hit Points Ruin SoD
Top