Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How I Would Do 5.75
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silam" data-source="post: 9876080" data-attributes="member: 7055898"><p>We are starting to beat dead horses, so I don’t think we’ll end up convincing one another either way… but I am surprised to read these posts (not just from you, others as well). It’s as if we’re not reading from the same rules book…</p><p></p><p>The Monk and the Wizard classes, in a few numbers…</p><p></p><p>- Core class: 3 full pages each (including the table) for the base features/mechanics, so that takes up the same amount of text. But… the Wizard’s core also includes 4 full pages of spell list. These are not spell descriptions, it’s basically a table of content (except WotC didn’t even have the courtesy of appending page numbers <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😅" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f605.png" title="Grinning face with sweat :sweat_smile:" data-shortname=":sweat_smile:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> … you have to flip through and find the spells). So, 3 versus 7 for the core.</p><p></p><p>- Subclasses are 4 x half-page in both cases. Equal.</p><p></p><p>- Expendable resources quantity: Wizards from levels 1 to 20 have 2 to 22 slots per day (few more with Arcane Recovery), while Monks from levels 1 to 20 have 0 to 20 focus points. So that's a comparable amount of expendable resources, if we consider a single big fight per day. But at most/many tables there will be short rests, which means the Monk regains those resources much more easily, and need not be very frugal with them (at least compared to a Wizard). As I've been trying to explain, that's very forgiving from a learning curve standpoint. It's easy to experiment and worse case you've made a bad decision that affects you until the next short rest only, not the whole day.</p><p></p><p>- Diversity of options: I think this is where the crux of the "Monks are complex" argument comes from... what can you do with these slots and these focus points? From levels 2 to 18, the core Monk classes gains a total of 7 different ways to spend focus points. The Monk subclasses give a few more ways, but not many (maybe 50% more options in some cases). Whereas the Wizard, from levels 1 to 20, has 4 to 25 prepared spells. Many of the spells can be upcast (which has no analogy on the Monk-side, AFAICT), and some spells have multiple effects to choose from (e.g., which energy to protect against, etc) so even the 4-25 number is a bit of an understatement, since many of the spells can be used in more than one way. The core Monk has one debuff option (Stunning Strike), how many debuff options does the Wizard have? The Monk has two ways of using their Bonus Action to improve mobility, how many mobility buff options does the Wizard have?</p><p></p><p>- Build-wise, I've already talked about it at length... there are so many more options for the Wizard, both in terms of level up complexity and how the character can be changed from day-to-day due to spells preparation. I won't repeat it here. I'll just say that even if we completely ignore build complexity (which is fine if you want to do that) the above points all stand regardless..</p><p></p><p>I really don't get how the Monk is more complicated. Unless, like I said earlier, if the argument is that Monks are in general a weaker class and therefore it's "complex" to keep up with peers at a high-powered table, then yeah sure, I can see that argument. But that to me seems like a very narrow definition of complexity.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, we can agree to disagree. Though I don't mean to shut down the conversation. If anyone still has steam, please feel free to explain your perspective further. Either quantitatively (as I've tried to do in this post) or based on your own experience (as I've also tried to do in an earlier post about the difficulty of onboarding new players who never played D&D before) or in any other way you think is relevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silam, post: 9876080, member: 7055898"] We are starting to beat dead horses, so I don’t think we’ll end up convincing one another either way… but I am surprised to read these posts (not just from you, others as well). It’s as if we’re not reading from the same rules book… The Monk and the Wizard classes, in a few numbers… - Core class: 3 full pages each (including the table) for the base features/mechanics, so that takes up the same amount of text. But… the Wizard’s core also includes 4 full pages of spell list. These are not spell descriptions, it’s basically a table of content (except WotC didn’t even have the courtesy of appending page numbers 😅 … you have to flip through and find the spells). So, 3 versus 7 for the core. - Subclasses are 4 x half-page in both cases. Equal. - Expendable resources quantity: Wizards from levels 1 to 20 have 2 to 22 slots per day (few more with Arcane Recovery), while Monks from levels 1 to 20 have 0 to 20 focus points. So that's a comparable amount of expendable resources, if we consider a single big fight per day. But at most/many tables there will be short rests, which means the Monk regains those resources much more easily, and need not be very frugal with them (at least compared to a Wizard). As I've been trying to explain, that's very forgiving from a learning curve standpoint. It's easy to experiment and worse case you've made a bad decision that affects you until the next short rest only, not the whole day. - Diversity of options: I think this is where the crux of the "Monks are complex" argument comes from... what can you do with these slots and these focus points? From levels 2 to 18, the core Monk classes gains a total of 7 different ways to spend focus points. The Monk subclasses give a few more ways, but not many (maybe 50% more options in some cases). Whereas the Wizard, from levels 1 to 20, has 4 to 25 prepared spells. Many of the spells can be upcast (which has no analogy on the Monk-side, AFAICT), and some spells have multiple effects to choose from (e.g., which energy to protect against, etc) so even the 4-25 number is a bit of an understatement, since many of the spells can be used in more than one way. The core Monk has one debuff option (Stunning Strike), how many debuff options does the Wizard have? The Monk has two ways of using their Bonus Action to improve mobility, how many mobility buff options does the Wizard have? - Build-wise, I've already talked about it at length... there are so many more options for the Wizard, both in terms of level up complexity and how the character can be changed from day-to-day due to spells preparation. I won't repeat it here. I'll just say that even if we completely ignore build complexity (which is fine if you want to do that) the above points all stand regardless.. I really don't get how the Monk is more complicated. Unless, like I said earlier, if the argument is that Monks are in general a weaker class and therefore it's "complex" to keep up with peers at a high-powered table, then yeah sure, I can see that argument. But that to me seems like a very narrow definition of complexity. Anyway, we can agree to disagree. Though I don't mean to shut down the conversation. If anyone still has steam, please feel free to explain your perspective further. Either quantitatively (as I've tried to do in this post) or based on your own experience (as I've also tried to do in an earlier post about the difficulty of onboarding new players who never played D&D before) or in any other way you think is relevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How I Would Do 5.75
Top