Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How I would do 6E.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horwath" data-source="post: 9837849" data-attributes="member: 6801299"><p>however you want to play the game, 6E should be started with complexity 10 that you can as a player lower on your PC design as much or as little as you want.</p><p></p><p>Good example is Pillars of Eternity 2.</p><p>you could make your character as complex or as simple as you wanted it to be.</p><p>when you picked your talent(feat) at every level or more than one, you could pick an active one, a passive ability or upgrade to already gained ability.</p><p>you could go trough 20 levels with only one or two active abilities that you must decide to use on your action. Rest was just +X to some stat that you have.</p><p>this is especially useful if you run the mod for 8 party members as you want as much dialogue options in quests as you can get, making 5 characters with "passive" only is great way to reduce your mental load as you just lead your character and maybe one or two more for spells.</p><p></p><p></p><p>it's easy to dumb down the game if it's made complex in start, it's hard to increase complexity of a game if basic design is simple.</p><p></p><p>it's the fighter with champion and battlemaster options, one is completely passive one requires decision points on most attacks.</p><p>every class should be made in similar way at basic design.</p><p></p><p>or with feats, and a lot more feat slots.</p><p>then for martials, feat can be(not including ASIs):</p><p></p><p>fighting style</p><p>2 weapon masteries</p><p>2 maneuvers + 2 dice(d6)</p><p>+1 crit range</p><p>+1d8 sneak attack</p><p>and usual feats for martial characters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>spellcasters could use 2 preparation slots for same spell for extra effect.</p><p>IE fireball might get d8 damage die instead of d6 if your use two preparation slots. Turning and active preparation slot into a passive one. Or saves might be at disadvatage vs it. Or both for 3 preparation slots.</p><p></p><p>cure wounds might get 60ft range and Bonus action cast time for extra preparation slot. or +3d6 healing per level for one extra preparation slot</p><p>or a feat that gives +4 preparation slots that you can use anyway you want it. New spell or a passive spell upgrade.</p><p></p><p>6th level wizard could have 15 preparation slots, but only 5 spells prepared. rest are upgrades to those spells.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horwath, post: 9837849, member: 6801299"] however you want to play the game, 6E should be started with complexity 10 that you can as a player lower on your PC design as much or as little as you want. Good example is Pillars of Eternity 2. you could make your character as complex or as simple as you wanted it to be. when you picked your talent(feat) at every level or more than one, you could pick an active one, a passive ability or upgrade to already gained ability. you could go trough 20 levels with only one or two active abilities that you must decide to use on your action. Rest was just +X to some stat that you have. this is especially useful if you run the mod for 8 party members as you want as much dialogue options in quests as you can get, making 5 characters with "passive" only is great way to reduce your mental load as you just lead your character and maybe one or two more for spells. it's easy to dumb down the game if it's made complex in start, it's hard to increase complexity of a game if basic design is simple. it's the fighter with champion and battlemaster options, one is completely passive one requires decision points on most attacks. every class should be made in similar way at basic design. or with feats, and a lot more feat slots. then for martials, feat can be(not including ASIs): fighting style 2 weapon masteries 2 maneuvers + 2 dice(d6) +1 crit range +1d8 sneak attack and usual feats for martial characters. spellcasters could use 2 preparation slots for same spell for extra effect. IE fireball might get d8 damage die instead of d6 if your use two preparation slots. Turning and active preparation slot into a passive one. Or saves might be at disadvatage vs it. Or both for 3 preparation slots. cure wounds might get 60ft range and Bonus action cast time for extra preparation slot. or +3d6 healing per level for one extra preparation slot or a feat that gives +4 preparation slots that you can use anyway you want it. New spell or a passive spell upgrade. 6th level wizard could have 15 preparation slots, but only 5 spells prepared. rest are upgrades to those spells. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How I would do 6E.
Top