Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Important/Feasible is 3 good NADs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prestidigitalis" data-source="post: 4622029" data-attributes="member: 74496"><p>With 3 NADs but only 2 ability score bumps, is it really possible to maintain 3 good NADs at high levels? </p><p></p><p>If it is possible, is it worth the cost? If not possible, is it better to have 2 good NADs and 1 bad one, or all 3 mediocre?</p><p></p><p>The best case I can think of is a Human Paladin with 16-14-14-13-10-8 ability scores, with the human stat bump in one of the 14s, giving 16-16-14-etc., for example Str 16 Dex 14 Cha 16. At Level 1, this gives defense of FD: 15 RD: 14 WD: 15.</p><p></p><p>Assume the Paladin takes the 3 Paragon tier NAD feats (Great Fortitude, Iron Will and Lightning Reflexes) and pushes one ability score every bump and splits the other bumps evenly between the other two. Assume the Demigod Epic Destiny. All that combined gives the following at level 30:</p><p></p><p>Str: 26</p><p>Dex: 20</p><p>Cha: 20 (or swap Str and Cha)</p><p></p><p>FD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 8 (Str) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 41</p><p>RD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 5 (Dex) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 38</p><p>WD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 5 (Cha) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 38</p><p></p><p>An Ancient Red Dragon (Level 30) is supposed to be a pretty easy encounter for a party full of such characters, but all 3 of the dragon's NAD attacks would have a +35 bonus and a very good chance of hitting, even if they were against FD, which they aren't.</p><p></p><p>Should we look at Orcus out of the corner of our eyes as we flee? His two NAD attacks are both against FD, at +33 and +38 respectively. But somehow, the idea that Orcus will *only* reduce our fearless Paladin to 0 hit points 65% of the time is not very reassuring. And that's for a Paladin deliberately built for NADs, at the cost of a low primary attack score.</p><p></p><p>Those are the two archetypal high-Epic-level challenges, and neither one gives me much confidence that there is a way to make NADs matter much at high levels.</p><p></p><p>What is the secret? Is it that Epic-level parties have all sorts of non-Defense ways to avoid taking damage or effects? Is it that situational bonuses tip the scales -- bonuses that I'm not taking into account? Is it that the right approach is *not* to try to balance the NADs, but to push 2 of them to high levels and ignore the third? </p><p></p><p>Or is it that no one actually tries to take on Orcus, or maybe that no one is really playing at high Epic levels?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prestidigitalis, post: 4622029, member: 74496"] With 3 NADs but only 2 ability score bumps, is it really possible to maintain 3 good NADs at high levels? If it is possible, is it worth the cost? If not possible, is it better to have 2 good NADs and 1 bad one, or all 3 mediocre? The best case I can think of is a Human Paladin with 16-14-14-13-10-8 ability scores, with the human stat bump in one of the 14s, giving 16-16-14-etc., for example Str 16 Dex 14 Cha 16. At Level 1, this gives defense of FD: 15 RD: 14 WD: 15. Assume the Paladin takes the 3 Paragon tier NAD feats (Great Fortitude, Iron Will and Lightning Reflexes) and pushes one ability score every bump and splits the other bumps evenly between the other two. Assume the Demigod Epic Destiny. All that combined gives the following at level 30: Str: 26 Dex: 20 Cha: 20 (or swap Str and Cha) FD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 8 (Str) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 41 RD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 5 (Dex) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 38 WD: 10 base + 15 (levels) + 5 (Cha) + 2 (feat) + 6 (cloak) = 38 An Ancient Red Dragon (Level 30) is supposed to be a pretty easy encounter for a party full of such characters, but all 3 of the dragon's NAD attacks would have a +35 bonus and a very good chance of hitting, even if they were against FD, which they aren't. Should we look at Orcus out of the corner of our eyes as we flee? His two NAD attacks are both against FD, at +33 and +38 respectively. But somehow, the idea that Orcus will *only* reduce our fearless Paladin to 0 hit points 65% of the time is not very reassuring. And that's for a Paladin deliberately built for NADs, at the cost of a low primary attack score. Those are the two archetypal high-Epic-level challenges, and neither one gives me much confidence that there is a way to make NADs matter much at high levels. What is the secret? Is it that Epic-level parties have all sorts of non-Defense ways to avoid taking damage or effects? Is it that situational bonuses tip the scales -- bonuses that I'm not taking into account? Is it that the right approach is *not* to try to balance the NADs, but to push 2 of them to high levels and ignore the third? Or is it that no one actually tries to take on Orcus, or maybe that no one is really playing at high Epic levels? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How Important/Feasible is 3 good NADs?
Top