Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How Important is it that Warlords be Healers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6105330" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>IME a lot of the earlier monsters were fine too, but there were some bad ones, and a lot of higher level ones that were just mediocre. There was definitely a learning curve where it took them a year to really get it down hard once the game was released. Still, I use plenty of MM1 monsters today and they're fine. Sometimes I up their damage a bit or whatever, but mostly if you put them in interesting situations then they're fine. The MM3 and on versions are always EVEN BETTER of course. The same is true for MM1 solos. I actually ran an MM1 adult white dragon fight early on, and it was pretty good. I threw in a bunch of chillborn zombies and stuff like that and had them frozen in ice pillars that would get smashed during the fight, there was glare ice, and pieces of roof that would fall. It would be a lot better with the new White Dragon I'd guess, but the old Solos were workable, at least at low-mid level. You had to add action denial recovery tricks at high levels, but MM2 came out by the time we got there and had some usable designs.</p><p></p><p>I would say this, the 4e monsters weren't the best ones ever starting out, mostly, but WotC followed through and kept iterating better designs and wasn't afraid to roll out replacements. Contrast with the 1e MM where the monsters were not bad, a mixed bag from great to kinda bad, but they never tweaked any of them based on lessons learned. We didn't get improved versions until 2e (some huge improvements), which was kinda a long time to wait.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Eh, I dunno, when I did Caves of Chaos we didn't literally just run in, we snuck up, ganked the outdoor kobolds, avoided the orc cave trap, chose a direction that had seemingly less orcs and just went for it. We'd barge a door and just take them. That was the first playtest packet, so maybe it was different later. It wasn't quite totally mindless charging in, but IME that isn't a real winner in 4e either. Triggering 2 encounters at once is bad news. See the famous Iron Tooth encounter in KotS where you get ganked for that right quick. </p><p></p><p>4e does have daily buffs, which will last 5 minutes, but there aren't a ton of them that you want to use before a fight. That role is played more by potions than anything else in 4e. That and some rituals. You'd also use story means (getting some allies, setting an ambush, etc). I always found the AD&D/3e buffing ritual a bit formulaic once you did it a couple times. I think there could be a shift in balance back in that direction some, because for instance it means weaker monsters can be a bit more challenge, you don't waste your buffs on them, so it can help a bit with quicker skirmish type fights. Its fun too, and 4e did seem to de-emphasize it. You COULD still play that way, it just wasn't the only sane way to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6105330, member: 82106"] IME a lot of the earlier monsters were fine too, but there were some bad ones, and a lot of higher level ones that were just mediocre. There was definitely a learning curve where it took them a year to really get it down hard once the game was released. Still, I use plenty of MM1 monsters today and they're fine. Sometimes I up their damage a bit or whatever, but mostly if you put them in interesting situations then they're fine. The MM3 and on versions are always EVEN BETTER of course. The same is true for MM1 solos. I actually ran an MM1 adult white dragon fight early on, and it was pretty good. I threw in a bunch of chillborn zombies and stuff like that and had them frozen in ice pillars that would get smashed during the fight, there was glare ice, and pieces of roof that would fall. It would be a lot better with the new White Dragon I'd guess, but the old Solos were workable, at least at low-mid level. You had to add action denial recovery tricks at high levels, but MM2 came out by the time we got there and had some usable designs. I would say this, the 4e monsters weren't the best ones ever starting out, mostly, but WotC followed through and kept iterating better designs and wasn't afraid to roll out replacements. Contrast with the 1e MM where the monsters were not bad, a mixed bag from great to kinda bad, but they never tweaked any of them based on lessons learned. We didn't get improved versions until 2e (some huge improvements), which was kinda a long time to wait. Eh, I dunno, when I did Caves of Chaos we didn't literally just run in, we snuck up, ganked the outdoor kobolds, avoided the orc cave trap, chose a direction that had seemingly less orcs and just went for it. We'd barge a door and just take them. That was the first playtest packet, so maybe it was different later. It wasn't quite totally mindless charging in, but IME that isn't a real winner in 4e either. Triggering 2 encounters at once is bad news. See the famous Iron Tooth encounter in KotS where you get ganked for that right quick. 4e does have daily buffs, which will last 5 minutes, but there aren't a ton of them that you want to use before a fight. That role is played more by potions than anything else in 4e. That and some rituals. You'd also use story means (getting some allies, setting an ambush, etc). I always found the AD&D/3e buffing ritual a bit formulaic once you did it a couple times. I think there could be a shift in balance back in that direction some, because for instance it means weaker monsters can be a bit more challenge, you don't waste your buffs on them, so it can help a bit with quicker skirmish type fights. Its fun too, and 4e did seem to de-emphasize it. You COULD still play that way, it just wasn't the only sane way to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How Important is it that Warlords be Healers?
Top