Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Important is Magic to Dungeons and Dragons? - Third Edition vs Fourth Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4778531" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>As has been pointed out, there is a real difference between acknowledging the (vastly overstated) number of explanations, and agreeing that even one of those explanations is satisfactory. Especially given that most of those explanations are restatements of a few very basic explanations, for which the reasons that they are not satisfactory (to those who do not find them so) have been given repeatedly.</p><p></p><p>If you do not care that some folks don't find those explanations satisfactory, then no problem. Otherwise, simply repeating the same is unlikely to gain converts....a truism on both sides of the argument! One can try to understand the opposition's point, then either answer the argument or accept it at face value. </p><p></p><p>There have been some nice answers to the argument of both sides in this thread, IMHO. While I haven't found the answers even remotely satisfactory, I do feel like I better understand why others view 4e's martial powers as "non-magical". And, sometimes, that is the best one can hope for. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would tend to agree for a whole host of arguments along this line in various threads, but I think that the topic is a little more complex in this case.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One of the few 2e books I didn't manage to own! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that argument is rather flimsy when taken at face value. It assumes that the word "martial" means, in 4e, what it means in common parlance. In fact, upthread, one of the big arguments against calling martial powers magical is that magical in 4e doesn't mean the same thing as it does in common parlance. </p><p></p><p>If that is so, then there is no reason to assume that martial means the same in 4e as in common parlance.</p><p></p><p>If that is not so, then through the common parlance definitions, several of these powers are magical.</p><p></p><p>Either way, this argument fails.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 4778531, member: 18280"] As has been pointed out, there is a real difference between acknowledging the (vastly overstated) number of explanations, and agreeing that even one of those explanations is satisfactory. Especially given that most of those explanations are restatements of a few very basic explanations, for which the reasons that they are not satisfactory (to those who do not find them so) have been given repeatedly. If you do not care that some folks don't find those explanations satisfactory, then no problem. Otherwise, simply repeating the same is unlikely to gain converts....a truism on both sides of the argument! One can try to understand the opposition's point, then either answer the argument or accept it at face value. There have been some nice answers to the argument of both sides in this thread, IMHO. While I haven't found the answers even remotely satisfactory, I do feel like I better understand why others view 4e's martial powers as "non-magical". And, sometimes, that is the best one can hope for. ;) I would tend to agree for a whole host of arguments along this line in various threads, but I think that the topic is a little more complex in this case. One of the few 2e books I didn't manage to own! :lol: I think that argument is rather flimsy when taken at face value. It assumes that the word "martial" means, in 4e, what it means in common parlance. In fact, upthread, one of the big arguments against calling martial powers magical is that magical in 4e doesn't mean the same thing as it does in common parlance. If that is so, then there is no reason to assume that martial means the same in 4e as in common parlance. If that is not so, then through the common parlance definitions, several of these powers are magical. Either way, this argument fails. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Important is Magic to Dungeons and Dragons? - Third Edition vs Fourth Edition
Top