Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is D&D of any edition realistic?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vulcan_idic" data-source="post: 4244319" data-attributes="member: 19615"><p>But you didn't point this out - at least not in a logical, clear method of communication. You quoted statistics based on the assumption of a highly skilled/experienced individual, and, while provideing no comparable statistics of a nonskilled/experienced individual in the same circumstances, quoted statistics of a theoretically comparably skilled character in the game. Then you stated that experience has zero proven bearing on the issue. The fact that you specifically pointed out that the quoted statistics assume a highly skilled/experienced person, in the absence of any support to the contrary calls into question your claim that such skill/experience has no bearing. </p><p></p><p>If your intent was merely to point out that probabilities were off, why was it necesary to point out your were quoting statistics based on an assumption that you claim, "have zero proven bearing on one's ability to survive a free fall from hundreds of feet in the air" why not just leave out the assuption. To put it another way, what you said there was akin to saying, "The odds of my shopping for a sword like that in the real world, assuming it rained last weekend, are something on the level of greater than 1 in 1,000,000. In D&D, assuming a Level 10 character, those odds are more like 1 in 3. [Note: In real life, weather patterns the previous weekend have zero proven bearing on one's tendency to go shopping for a sword.]" If the weather patterns are irrelevant to your argument about buying a sword as your last state ment claims (and I would wager most of us would agree that it is) why do you take the time that you are assuming it in the first statement thus causing the reader to expect that there *is* some as-yet unseen correlation between the facts only to later refute the expectation that you yourself set up? This confuses the reader and clouds your message.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vulcan_idic, post: 4244319, member: 19615"] But you didn't point this out - at least not in a logical, clear method of communication. You quoted statistics based on the assumption of a highly skilled/experienced individual, and, while provideing no comparable statistics of a nonskilled/experienced individual in the same circumstances, quoted statistics of a theoretically comparably skilled character in the game. Then you stated that experience has zero proven bearing on the issue. The fact that you specifically pointed out that the quoted statistics assume a highly skilled/experienced person, in the absence of any support to the contrary calls into question your claim that such skill/experience has no bearing. If your intent was merely to point out that probabilities were off, why was it necesary to point out your were quoting statistics based on an assumption that you claim, "have zero proven bearing on one's ability to survive a free fall from hundreds of feet in the air" why not just leave out the assuption. To put it another way, what you said there was akin to saying, "The odds of my shopping for a sword like that in the real world, assuming it rained last weekend, are something on the level of greater than 1 in 1,000,000. In D&D, assuming a Level 10 character, those odds are more like 1 in 3. [Note: In real life, weather patterns the previous weekend have zero proven bearing on one's tendency to go shopping for a sword.]" If the weather patterns are irrelevant to your argument about buying a sword as your last state ment claims (and I would wager most of us would agree that it is) why do you take the time that you are assuming it in the first statement thus causing the reader to expect that there *is* some as-yet unseen correlation between the facts only to later refute the expectation that you yourself set up? This confuses the reader and clouds your message. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is D&D of any edition realistic?
Top