Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hawke" data-source="post: 4412275" data-attributes="member: 61721">I'm trying to decide whether or not I should get into it. On one hand, it seems like a good time to do so and I like the 4E system and really want more. On the other hand, I've hated FR's massive NPC and history in the past. I always felt (which may be my issue) that with FR there's too much and too little leeway for the DM to go where they want with the world. Seems very static and only changing when novels/wotc does their stuff. Makes it hard for a DM to keep up especially with players who read all the books and are well versed. Seems like some may have changed with this itiration...&nbsp;Perhaps I should skip the Campaign Setting and just pick up the Player's Guide for some new crunch? &nbsp;Thanks for all the replies, I've been well educated about some of the changes... I'm eager to hear additional objective comments once the campaign setting book is out this month.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hawke, post: 4412275, member: 61721"] I'm trying to decide whether or not I should get into it. On one hand, it seems like a good time to do so and I like the 4E system and really want more. On the other hand, I've hated FR's massive NPC and history in the past. I always felt (which may be my issue) that with FR there's too much and too little leeway for the DM to go where they want with the world. Seems very static and only changing when novels/wotc does their stuff. Makes it hard for a DM to keep up especially with players who read all the books and are well versed. Seems like some may have changed with this itiration... Perhaps I should skip the Campaign Setting and just pick up the Player's Guide for some new crunch? Thanks for all the replies, I've been well educated about some of the changes... I'm eager to hear additional objective comments once the campaign setting book is out this month. [/QUOTE]

Verification