Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gss000" data-source="post: 8644673" data-attributes="member: 7016012">Jeez. That is not a tortured interpretation. First - again - I'm not even saying it's bad now. Read his actual statement.&nbsp; Mona writes, &quot;Most of our subscriptions are higher now than they were 2 years ago. In ALL of those cases they are also higher than they were 3 years ago. And 5 years ago.&quot; He's saying that PF2 is better in year two than at points toward the end of PF1's lifecycle. That's good. I didn't say it was doing poorly, but it's not a celebration statement that a relatively new game raises subscriptions from a game at that's been out for a while and was clearly not gaining players due to age.Read. My. Post. I said Foundry is the best supported platform, which all your statements incdicate. What the message says is Paizo thinks Foundry is the best platform for its games. It doesn't say anything about numbers. There are a whole host of reasons - like Foundry willing to put effort into modules that Roll 20 will not - that it wants to support Foundry over Roll 20. And I don't blame them. But as I said, best supported does not necessarily mean most players on the VTT.By your logic, Pathfinder making a 5E game means it knows where the players are- and it's not PF2. To be explicit, I don't actually believe that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gss000, post: 8644673, member: 7016012"] Jeez. That is not a tortured interpretation. First - again - I'm not even saying it's bad now. Read his actual statement. Mona writes, "Most of our subscriptions are higher now than they were 2 years ago. In ALL of those cases they are also higher than they were 3 years ago. And 5 years ago." He's saying that PF2 is better in year two than at points toward the end of PF1's lifecycle. That's good. I didn't say it was doing poorly, but it's not a celebration statement that a relatively new game raises subscriptions from a game at that's been out for a while and was clearly not gaining players due to age. Read. My. Post. I said Foundry is the best supported platform, which all your statements incdicate. What the message says is Paizo thinks Foundry is the best platform for its games. It doesn't say anything about numbers. There are a whole host of reasons - like Foundry willing to put effort into modules that Roll 20 will not - that it wants to support Foundry over Roll 20. And I don't blame them. But as I said, best supported does not necessarily mean most players on the VTT. By your logic, Pathfinder making a 5E game means it knows where the players are- and it's not PF2. To be explicit, I don't actually believe that. [/QUOTE]

Verification