Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bravesteel25" data-source="post: 8701875" data-attributes="member: 7019473">This is where I'm at as well. I was pretty deep into 5E for a long while, but it's warts began to show. It got to the point where I'd rather not play in my weekly D&amp;D game at my LFGS than play 5E.* Then PF2 hit the scene and now 5E just is not even remotely palatable for me in any way shape or form.I completely understand why D&amp;D is the market leader, but when it comes to recruiting/finding games compared to D&amp;D it can be a little frustrating when one is subjectively better to me.*Edit (8/17/22): While I have my problems with 5E, it still remains the most widely available and visible game in the hobby. My scene IS 5E, so that's what I run and play. While I'd like to say that I'd rather not play than play 5E, I'd be lying if I tried to pass that off as the truth. If I'm being honest, D&amp;D will just take the excellent stuff that PF2 is doing and work it into the next edition anyway.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bravesteel25, post: 8701875, member: 7019473"] This is where I'm at as well. I was pretty deep into 5E for a long while, but it's warts began to show. It got to the point where I'd rather not play in my weekly D&D game at my LFGS than play 5E.* Then PF2 hit the scene and now 5E just is not even remotely palatable for me in any way shape or form. I completely understand why D&D is the market leader, but when it comes to recruiting/finding games compared to D&D it can be a little frustrating when one is subjectively better to me. [B]*Edit (8/17/22):[/B] While I have my problems with 5E, it still remains the most widely available and visible game in the hobby. My scene IS 5E, so that's what I run and play. While I'd like to say that I'd rather not play than play 5E, I'd be lying if I tried to pass that off as the truth. If I'm being honest, D&D will just take the excellent stuff that PF2 is doing and work it into the next edition anyway. [/QUOTE]

Verification