Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dirtypool" data-source="post: 8715930" data-attributes="member: 7033897">Sure, but with the knowledge that there is a better functionality at Foundry that group could logically be smaller without it meaning anything about PF2's success.&nbsp; To say nothing of the fact that there are 14.9% of Roll20 Campaigns listed as &quot;Uncategorized&quot; and 11.5% listed as &quot;Other&quot; Any portion of those percentages could indeed be PF2 campaigns.Or Roll20 is quite fine with their platform seen as being the home for 5e and don't want to antagonize that relationship by courting the competition.&nbsp; There could be any number of reasons that they've not gone after a contract with Paizo.I'm also unclear on your starting premise of &quot;if PF2 was selling gangbusters&quot; are you suggesting that it is selling poorly?&nbsp; It is the #2 selling game on the ICv2, if it's selling so poorly that it needs to be called out for doing so then we should pack up the rest of the hobby because the game is over.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dirtypool, post: 8715930, member: 7033897"] Sure, but with the knowledge that there is a better functionality at Foundry that group could logically be smaller without it meaning anything about PF2's success. To say nothing of the fact that there are 14.9% of Roll20 Campaigns listed as "Uncategorized" and 11.5% listed as "Other" Any portion of those percentages could indeed be PF2 campaigns. Or Roll20 is quite fine with their platform seen as being the home for 5e and don't want to antagonize that relationship by courting the competition. There could be any number of reasons that they've not gone after a contract with Paizo. I'm also unclear on your starting premise of "if PF2 was selling gangbusters" are you suggesting that it is selling poorly? It is the #2 selling game on the ICv2, if it's selling so poorly that it needs to be called out for doing so then we should pack up the rest of the hobby because the game is over. [/QUOTE]

Verification