Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 2807042" data-attributes="member: 10479">That would be a mistake.  You are not in a position to make that claim and have it universally accepted.  Anyone who wants to properly use OGC has to accept whatever designation anyone else uses or seek whatever remedy the licensing allows.  If you feel the designation is unclear, avoid the material or take the party to court if you feel that is advisable or get WotC to take them to court if you feel that is proper.No, he didn't.  He gave permission, through the license, to use the OGC he has released from that product.  Be specific, please, lest you cause others through the same inaccurate use of language to make similar mistakes.Please, don't do that.  You and I can (and always have) treat(ed) one another with more respect than that.You're not going to release "Mythic Heroes" at all.  That's the name of his copyrighted work.  You need to be more specific (see above).You keep trying to force a designation that decreases the effort of your labors (the "starts (here) and stops (here)" type). [highlight]Why not take the time to write up what it is you want to use and run it by Wulf through email if you are unclear on how to separate his OGC from his non-OGC?[/highlight]  You'd have to write it up anyway, so it really doesn't require any extra work.I made the statement to cover all cases, not just yours.I jumped into to this thread to help you, Yair, because I like you and have always thought that whatever the differences you might have with others (regarding your OGC project ideas) you were an honorable person who was really, at the heart of things, trying to do the right thing.  That's how I operate and I am usually a pretty good judge of that in others.  Whatever the source of the difference of opinion, and I doubt Wulf and I are of exactly the same mind, is not relevant.  Your goal, I assume, is to use OGC from Wulf's source.  There's a solution (highlighted by me above in this post) that doesn't require a lot of time wasted and if you do not persue it then I must be mistaken in my assumption about your goal.  If that is not your goal then please state what it is.  If you're just ball busting about the designation I'm going to be very, very disappointed with you.  I'm hoping I haven't misjudged your intentions.</blockquote>

Verification